EWA vs. SCHD
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).
EWA and SCHD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Australia Index. It was launched on Mar 18, 1996. SCHD is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. It was launched on Oct 20, 2011. Both EWA and SCHD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWA or SCHD.
Performance
EWA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 15.93% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 5.26%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.46% annualized return.
EWA
7.08%
-3.73%
3.26%
19.73%
6.48%
5.26%
SCHD
15.93%
-0.59%
9.36%
25.99%
12.42%
11.46%
Key characteristics
| EWA | SCHD | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.18 | 2.25 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.73 | 3.25 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.39 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.59 | 3.05 |
| Martin Ratio | 6.35 | 12.25 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.12% | 2.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.76% | 11.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -66.98% | -33.37% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.68% | -1.82% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between EWA and SCHD is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than SCHD's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF | 3.74% | 3.72% | 5.28% | 5.08% | 2.02% | 3.97% | 6.11% | 4.44% | 4.03% | 5.48% | 4.92% | 4.69% |
SCHD Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF | 3.41% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% | 2.63% | 2.47% |
Drawdowns
EWA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and SCHD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.55%. This indicates that EWA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.