EW vs. DHR

In the year-to-date period, EW achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly higher than DHR's -13.99% return. Over the past 10 years, EW has underperformed DHR with an annualized return of 13.42%, while DHR has yielded a comparatively higher 19.25% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) and Danaher Corporation (DHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EW Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is higher than the DHR Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EW and DHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

EW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.

The maximum EW drawdown since its inception was -54.32%, smaller than the maximum DHR drawdown of -65.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EW and DHR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (EW) is 11.47%, while Danaher Corporation (DHR) has a volatility of 17.28%. This indicates that EW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and Danaher Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.