PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVTR vs. CDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVTR vs. CDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than CDX's -1.79% return.


EVTR

1D
0.16%
1M
0.35%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.56%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CDX

1D
0.67%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
-1.79%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
-1.33%
3Y*
7.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVTR vs. CDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVTR
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF
0.43%8.10%4.07%
CDX
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF
-1.79%9.51%5.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EVTR and CDX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVTR vs. CDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVTR
EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CDX
CDX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
CDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVTR vs. CDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVTRCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.97

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

-0.32

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.03

-0.75

+6.78

EVTR vs. CDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the CDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVTR and CDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVTRCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

-0.23

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.34

0.39

+0.95

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. CDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum CDX drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and CDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVTRCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-13.24%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-4.18%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-6.79%

+5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-4.34%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

1.78%

-0.88%

Volatility

EVTR vs. CDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) is 1.41%, while Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF (CDX) has a volatility of 1.74%. This indicates that EVTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVTRCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.41%

1.74%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.77%

4.76%

-1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.66%

5.73%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.30%

11.10%

-6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.30%

11.10%

-6.80%

EVTR vs. CDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than CDX's 0.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVTR vs. CDX - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than CDX's 8.31% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CDX
Simplify High Yield PLUS Credit Hedge ETF
8.31%7.18%12.60%5.26%7.51%
EVTR
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF
4.67%4.51%4.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVTR and CDX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CDX has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to EVTR (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs CDX's -13.24%.

On 1-year performance, EVTR leads with 5.42% vs -1.33% for CDX. On fees, CDX is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, EVTR has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVTR has performed better with a 5.42% return vs -1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CDX is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EVTR.

CDX has the higher dividend yield at 8.31%, compared with 4.67% for EVTR.

EVTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while CDX is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EVTR and 0.26% for CDX.

EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVTR and CDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer