PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVH vs. KWEB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVH vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVH achieves a -5.50% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -20.06% return. Over the past 10 years, EVH has underperformed KWEB with an annualized return of -13.11%, while KWEB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.02% annualized return.


EVH

1D
-4.55%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
-5.50%
6M
-3.32%
1Y
-55.79%
3Y*
-50.43%
5Y*
-27.18%
10Y*
-13.11%

KWEB

1D
-3.92%
1M
-4.79%
YTD
-20.06%
6M
-22.24%
1Y
-12.78%
3Y*
4.05%
5Y*
-14.28%
10Y*
0.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVH vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVH
Evolent Health, Inc.
-5.50%-64.44%-65.94%17.63%1.48%72.61%77.13%-54.64%62.20%-16.89%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
-20.06%23.55%12.01%-9.06%-17.24%-49.01%58.23%29.92%-33.80%69.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EVH and KWEB is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2015

0.21

The correlation between EVH and KWEB shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVH vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVH
EVH Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EVH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVH Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
EVH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KWEB
KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVH vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVHKWEBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

0.94

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

-0.38

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.01

-0.76

-0.25

EVH vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVH Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVH and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVHKWEBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.76

-0.47

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

-0.30

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

0.00

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.22

0.06

-0.28

Drawdowns

EVH vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVH drawdown since its inception was -94.54%, which is greater than KWEB's maximum drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVH and KWEB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVHKWEBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.54%

-80.92%

-13.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-81.59%

-34.13%

-47.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-93.75%

-34.13%

-59.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.54%

-72.17%

-22.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.54%

-80.92%

-13.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.49%

-68.52%

-21.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-35.24%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.17%

16.85%

+38.32%

Volatility

EVH vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

Evolent Health, Inc. (EVH) has a higher volatility of 18.54% compared to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) at 11.52%. This indicates that EVH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVHKWEBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.54%

11.52%

+7.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.01%

20.11%

+30.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.03%

27.25%

+47.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.88%

47.67%

+12.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.69%

39.99%

+22.70%

Dividends

EVH vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

EVH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVH
Evolent Health, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KWEB
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
7.70%6.16%3.51%1.71%0.00%7.07%0.29%0.08%3.40%0.58%1.19%0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVH and KWEB have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVH has higher volatility (18.54%) compared to KWEB (11.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVH dropped -94.54% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

KWEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVH and KWEB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer