PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVF vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVF vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust (EVF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVF achieves a -1.66% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 9.37% return. Over the past 10 years, EVF has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 5.97%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.


EVF

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.42%
YTD
-1.66%
6M
-2.40%
1Y
-3.68%
3Y*
8.00%
5Y*
3.06%
10Y*
5.97%

DGRO

1D
0.16%
1M
0.96%
YTD
9.37%
6M
8.18%
1Y
21.50%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*
13.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVF vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVF
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust
-1.66%-6.15%7.31%34.53%-14.77%11.80%6.14%14.36%-2.40%3.08%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
9.37%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EVF and DGRO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.33

The correlation between EVF and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (3 years) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVF vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVF
EVF Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
EVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVF Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVF Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVF vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust (EVF) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVFDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.41

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

3.34

-3.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.88

12.88

-13.76

EVF vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVF Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVF and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVF vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVF drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVF and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVFDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.41%

-35.10%

-27.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-6.47%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-14.03%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.76%

-19.31%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

-35.10%

-5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.51%

-0.74%

-9.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.34%

-3.43%

-4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

1.67%

+2.50%

Volatility

EVF vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust (EVF) is 1.07%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that EVF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVFDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

2.48%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.32%

6.94%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

9.51%

-2.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.44%

13.79%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.18%

16.59%

-2.41%

Dividends

EVF vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

EVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.09%, more than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
EVF
Eaton Vance Senior Income Trust
9.09%9.58%10.13%10.51%9.45%5.37%6.16%6.58%6.27%5.57%6.06%7.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVF and DGRO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRO has higher volatility (2.48%) compared to EVF (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVF dropped -62.41% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVF and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer