EUSA vs. SPTM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).
EUSA and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUSA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Index. It was launched on May 5, 2010. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both EUSA and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EUSA or SPTM.
Performance
EUSA vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUSA achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 24.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EUSA has underperformed SPTM with an annualized return of 10.31%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.87% annualized return.
EUSA
18.44%
2.18%
11.04%
29.72%
11.60%
10.31%
SPTM
24.69%
1.31%
12.03%
31.89%
15.27%
12.87%
Key characteristics
| EUSA | SPTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.44 | 2.59 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.36 | 3.48 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.43 | 1.48 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.48 | 3.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 13.78 | 16.64 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.14% | 1.90% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.07% | 12.20% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.16% | -54.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.33% | -1.53% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUSA vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUSA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between EUSA and SPTM is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EUSA vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EUSA vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
EUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%, more than SPTM's 1.24% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUSA iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.73% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.49% | 2.01% | 1.50% | 1.59% | 2.21% | 1.91% | 1.97% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.24% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.71% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% | 2.08% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
EUSA vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUSA drawdown since its inception was -39.16%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUSA and SPTM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EUSA vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Equal Weighted ETF (EUSA) is 3.69%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that EUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.