EUNA.DE vs. VETA.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L).
EUNA.DE and VETA.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUNA.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Nov 21, 2017. VETA.L is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Euro Agg Govt TR EUR. It was launched on Feb 19, 2019. Both EUNA.DE and VETA.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EUNA.DE or VETA.L.
Key characteristics
| EUNA.DE | VETA.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.97% | -1.52% |
| 1Y Return | 7.37% | 5.36% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.67% | -4.86% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -1.50% | -3.92% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.62 | 0.81 |
| Daily Std Dev | 4.56% | 6.37% |
| Max Drawdown | -17.79% | -26.60% |
| Current Drawdown | -9.52% | -21.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUNA.DE and VETA.L is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EUNA.DE vs. VETA.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EUNA.DE achieves a 2.97% return, which is significantly higher than VETA.L's -1.52% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUNA.DE vs. VETA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUNA.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VETA.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EUNA.DE vs. VETA.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EUNA.DE vs. VETA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither EUNA.DE nor VETA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
EUNA.DE vs. VETA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUNA.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, smaller than the maximum VETA.L drawdown of -26.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUNA.DE and VETA.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EUNA.DE vs. VETA.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) and Vanguard EUR Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VETA.L) have volatilities of 2.29% and 2.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.