EUNA.AS vs. BNDW

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF (EUNA.AS) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW).

EUNA.AS and BNDW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUNA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 3, 2000. BNDW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2018. Both EUNA.AS and BNDW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EUNA.AS vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF (EUNA.AS) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EUNA.AS vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EUNA.AS iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF	0.00%	12.22%	8.08%	15.11%	-2.25%	26.64%	-6.34%	26.46%	-6.07%
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	1.55%	-7.44%	9.18%	3.97%	-7.48%	5.23%	-2.54%	10.82%	2.61%

Different Trading Currencies

EUNA.AS is traded in EUR, while BNDW is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BNDW values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

EUNA.AS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNDW

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.51%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: -3.65%
• 3Y*: 1.53%
• 5Y*: 0.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUNA.AS vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EUNA.AS has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio.

EUNA.AS

iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF

BNDW

Vanguard Total World Bond ETF

Return for Risk

EUNA.AS vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BNDW

BNDW Risk / Return Rank: 47
BNDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BNDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BNDW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BNDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
BNDW Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUNA.AS vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF (EUNA.AS) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUNA.AS	BNDW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.24	—

Correlation

The correlation between EUNA.AS and BNDW is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

EUNA.AS vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison

EUNA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than BNDW's 4.18% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUNA.AS iShares STOXX Europe 50 UCITS ETF	2.24%	2.52%	2.68%	2.56%	2.62%	2.22%	2.42%	2.96%	3.51%	3.24%	3.29%	3.05%
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF	4.18%	4.12%	3.90%	3.73%	2.02%	2.58%	1.56%	3.05%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	EUNA.AS	BNDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-17.22%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-1.85%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.05%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EUNA.AS	BNDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.99%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.64%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	8.11%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	7.91%	—