EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN2.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE).
EUN2.DE and SXR8.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUN2.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX® 50. It was launched on Apr 3, 2000. SXR8.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on May 19, 2010. Both EUN2.DE and SXR8.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EUN2.DE or SXR8.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between EUN2.DE and SXR8.DE is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EUN2.DE:
1.24
SXR8.DE:
2.12
EUN2.DE:
1.78
SXR8.DE:
2.92
EUN2.DE:
1.21
SXR8.DE:
1.42
EUN2.DE:
1.75
SXR8.DE:
3.26
EUN2.DE:
5.37
SXR8.DE:
14.16
EUN2.DE:
3.16%
SXR8.DE:
1.90%
EUN2.DE:
13.68%
SXR8.DE:
12.70%
EUN2.DE:
-65.11%
SXR8.DE:
-33.78%
EUN2.DE:
0.00%
SXR8.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EUN2.DE achieves a 10.61% return, which is significantly higher than SXR8.DE's 3.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EUN2.DE has underperformed SXR8.DE with an annualized return of 7.81%, while SXR8.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.95% annualized return.
EUN2.DE
10.61%
9.02%
14.75%
18.35%
9.92%
7.81%
SXR8.DE
3.87%
3.56%
19.49%
28.23%
14.85%
13.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUN2.DE has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SXR8.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EUN2.DE
SXR8.DE
EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN2.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Dividend Comparison
EUN2.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, while SXR8.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUN2.DE iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) | 2.73% | 3.02% | 3.02% | 2.92% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 3.02% | 3.70% | 2.85% | 3.38% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
SXR8.DE iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUN2.DE drawdown since its inception was -65.11%, which is greater than SXR8.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUN2.DE and SXR8.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EUN2.DE vs. SXR8.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (EUN2.DE) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR8.DE) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.