EUEA.AS vs. MEUD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUEA.AS) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L).
EUEA.AS and MEUD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EUEA.AS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 3, 2000. MEUD.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe NR EUR. It was launched on Apr 3, 2013. Both EUEA.AS and MEUD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EUEA.AS or MEUD.L.
Key characteristics
| EUEA.AS | MEUD.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.47% | 6.81% |
| 1Y Return | 14.76% | 12.82% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.57% | 5.90% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.90% | 7.35% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.10% | 7.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.25 | 1.16 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.85% | 10.73% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.19% | -28.57% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.68% | -2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EUEA.AS and MEUD.L is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
EUEA.AS vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EUEA.AS achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than MEUD.L's 6.81% return. Over the past 10 years, EUEA.AS has underperformed MEUD.L with an annualized return of 7.10%, while MEUD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EUEA.AS vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
EUEA.AS has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EUEA.AS vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUEA.AS) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EUEA.AS vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
EUEA.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, while MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUEA.AS iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 1.71% | 3.03% | 2.94% | 2.06% | 2.17% | 3.09% | 3.66% | 2.84% | 3.39% | 2.96% | 2.86% | 2.51% |
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EUEA.AS vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EUEA.AS drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than MEUD.L's maximum drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUEA.AS and MEUD.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EUEA.AS vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUEA.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 3.24%. This indicates that EUEA.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.