PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EUDA vs. KINS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EUDA vs. KINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDA achieves a -58.23% return, which is significantly lower than KINS's 19.41% return.


EUDA

1D
-1.30%
1M
39.05%
6M
-22.80%
YTD
-58.23%
1Y
-69.51%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-39.20%

KINS

1D
-1.29%
1M
-0.75%
6M
30.07%
YTD
19.41%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
160.75%
5Y*
22.68%
10Y*
10.58%
ALL TIME*
6.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.01K$61.34K$183.21K
$2.11M$2.26M$2.31M

EUDA vs. KINS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Limited
-58.23%-48.38%212.94%-13.21%-83.10%1.04%
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
19.41%11.54%613.15%57.78%-72.27%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDA and KINS is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

-0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EUDA:

$36.04M

KINS:

$289.26M

Total Revenue (TTM)

EUDA:

$5.16M

KINS:

$59.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EUDA:

$1.16M

KINS:

$100.92M

EBITDA (TTM)

EUDA:

-$1.99M

KINS:

-$6.57B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EUDA Health Holdings Limited

Kingstone Companies, Inc.

Return for Risk

EUDA vs. KINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EUDA
EUDA Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EUDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUDA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
EUDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

KINS
KINS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EUDA vs. KINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EUDAKINSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.13

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

0.97

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.07

2.16

-3.23

EUDA vs. KINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the KINS Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDA and KINS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EUDA vs. KINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDA drawdown since its inception was -97.39%, roughly equal to the maximum KINS drawdown of -96.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDA and KINS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EUDAKINSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.39%

-96.97%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.24%

-24.22%

-69.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.65%

-38.84%

-56.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.42%

-6.64%

-83.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-62.23%

-49.08%

-13.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

64.18%

11.24%

+52.94%

Volatility

EUDA vs. KINS - Volatility Comparison

EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) has a higher volatility of 44.21% compared to Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) at 9.93%. This indicates that EUDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EUDAKINSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.21%

9.93%

+34.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

120.94%

30.17%

+90.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

183.59%

40.18%

+143.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

127.75%

72.81%

+54.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

127.75%

59.49%

+68.26%

Dividends

EUDA vs. KINS - Dividend Comparison

EUDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EUDA
EUDA Health Holdings Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
1.00%0.59%0.00%0.00%8.89%3.20%2.74%4.19%2.26%1.61%1.82%2.36%

Financials

EUDA vs. KINS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EUDA Health Holdings Limited and Kingstone Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


EUDA and KINS have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EUDA has higher volatility (44.21%) compared to KINS (9.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDA dropped -97.39% vs KINS's -96.97%.

KINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EUDA and KINS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer