EUDA vs. KINS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EUDA (EUDA Health Holdings Limited) and KINS (Kingstone Companies, Inc.) are both stocks. EUDA operates in Health Information Services (Healthcare), while KINS operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, EUDA returned -16.82%/yr vs 122.25%/yr for KINS. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

EUDA vs. KINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDA achieves a -63.87% return, which is significantly lower than KINS's -9.29% return.

EUDA

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -2.33%
• YTD: -63.87%
• 6M: -70.82%
• 1Y: -74.86%
• 3Y*: -16.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KINS

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: -2.30%
• 3Y*: 122.25%
• 5Y*: 14.73%
• 10Y*: 7.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EUDA vs. KINS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EUDA EUDA Health Holdings Limited	-63.87%	-48.38%	212.94%	-13.21%	-83.10%	1.04%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	-9.29%	11.54%	613.15%	57.78%	-72.27%	5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between EUDA and KINS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021	-0.02

Fundamentals

EPS EUDA : $0.14 KINS : -$399.22
PS Ratio EUDA : 6.01 KINS : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) EUDA : $5.16M KINS : $59.92B
Gross Profit (TTM) EUDA : $1.16M KINS : $100.92M
EBITDA (TTM) EUDA : -$1.99M KINS : -$6.57B

Return for Risk

EUDA vs. KINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDA

EUDA Risk / Return Rank: 22
EUDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EUDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
EUDA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
EUDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EUDA Martin Ratio Rank: 10

KINS

KINS Risk / Return Rank: 36
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDA vs. KINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	-0.06	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	0.20	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.02	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	-0.10	-0.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.32	-0.21	-1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUDA vs. KINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the KINS Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDA and KINS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	-0.06	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	0.07	-0.40

Drawdowns

EUDA vs. KINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDA drawdown since its inception was -97.39%, roughly equal to the maximum KINS drawdown of -96.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDA and KINS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.39%	-96.97%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.24%	-24.22%	-69.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.65%	-38.84%	-56.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-91.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-96.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-91.71%	-29.08%	-62.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-61.20%	-49.30%	-11.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	56.85%	10.82%	+46.03%

Volatility

EUDA vs. KINS - Volatility Comparison

EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) has a higher volatility of 29.86% compared to Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) at 15.55%. This indicates that EUDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.86%	15.55%	+14.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	148.88%	28.66%	+120.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	178.29%	39.74%	+138.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	127.99%	72.67%	+55.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	127.99%	59.33%	+68.66%

Dividends

EUDA vs. KINS - Dividend Comparison

EUDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUDA EUDA Health Holdings Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	1.32%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.89%	3.20%	2.74%	4.19%	2.26%	1.61%	1.82%	2.36%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EUDA and KINS in my portfolio?

EUDA and KINS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EUDA or KINS?

EUDA has higher volatility (29.86%) compared to KINS (15.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EUDA dropped -97.39% vs KINS's -96.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.