EUDA vs. KINS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS).

Performance

EUDA vs. KINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EUDA vs. KINS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EUDA EUDA Health Holdings Limited	-78.56%	-48.38%	212.94%	-13.21%	-83.10%	1.04%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	-13.16%	11.54%	613.15%	57.78%	-72.27%	5.05%

Fundamentals

Market Cap EUDA : $368.03M KINS : $209.56M
EPS EUDA : $0.01 KINS : $1.02K
PE Ratio EUDA : 1.38K KINS : 0.01
PEG Ratio EUDA : 4.69 KINS : 0.00
PS Ratio EUDA : 71.32 KINS : 0.00
Total Revenue (TTM) EUDA : $5.16M KINS : $56.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) EUDA : $1.16M KINS : $61.86M
EBITDA (TTM) EUDA : -$1.99M KINS : $19.24B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EUDA achieves a -78.56% return, which is significantly lower than KINS's -13.16% return.

EUDA

• 1D: -9.13%
• 1M: -49.19%
• YTD: -78.56%
• 6M: -71.46%
• 1Y: -86.39%
• 3Y*: -30.88%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KINS

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -11.59%
• YTD: -13.16%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: -11.63%
• 3Y*: 122.46%
• 5Y*: 13.60%
• 10Y*: 7.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EUDA vs. KINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EUDA

EUDA Risk / Return Rank: 10
EUDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
EUDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
EUDA Omega Ratio Rank: 13
EUDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
EUDA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

KINS

KINS Risk / Return Rank: 31
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EUDA vs. KINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) and Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.59	-0.23	-0.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.87	0.02	-0.89
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.00	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	-0.35	-0.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.80	-0.48	-1.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EUDA vs. KINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EUDA Sharpe Ratio is -0.59, which is lower than the KINS Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EUDA and KINS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59	-0.23	-0.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.42	0.02	-0.44

Correlation

The correlation between EUDA and KINS is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

EUDA vs. KINS - Dividend Comparison

EUDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EUDA EUDA Health Holdings Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	1.03%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.89%	3.20%	2.74%	4.19%	2.26%	1.61%	1.82%	2.36%

Drawdowns

EUDA vs. KINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EUDA drawdown since its inception was -96.47%, roughly equal to the maximum KINS drawdown of -99.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EUDA and KINS.

Drawdown Indicators

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.47%	-99.52%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-91.55%	-38.84%	-52.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-91.33%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-96.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.08%	-32.10%	-62.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.86%	-49.46%	-10.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.92%	27.85%	+20.07%

Volatility

EUDA vs. KINS - Volatility Comparison

EUDA Health Holdings Limited (EUDA) has a higher volatility of 58.63% compared to Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) at 8.23%. This indicates that EUDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EUDA	KINS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	58.63%	8.23%	+50.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	138.21%	22.34%	+115.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	146.51%	51.08%	+95.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	120.50%	72.50%	+48.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	120.50%	59.08%	+61.42%

Financials

EUDA vs. KINS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EUDA Health Holdings Limited and Kingstone Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

EUDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EUDA Health Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 417.66K and revenue of 1.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

KINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 56.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EUDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EUDA Health Holdings Limited reported an operating income of -566.09K and revenue of 1.53M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.0%.

KINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 56.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

EUDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EUDA Health Holdings Limited reported a net income of -602.00K and revenue of 1.53M, resulting in a net margin of -39.4%.

KINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 14.76B and revenue of 56.42B, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.