PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETX vs. CXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ETX vs. CXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (ETX) and MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ETX vs. CXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ETX
Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust
0.50%11.72%6.87%1.32%-13.52%-4.67%11.31%19.57%-3.74%10.22%
CXH
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
2.28%4.39%9.77%10.39%-27.91%10.50%5.37%16.63%-4.89%8.75%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ETX:

$202.09M

CXH:

$65.84M

EPS

ETX:

$1.37

CXH:

$1.19

PE Ratio

ETX:

13.57

CXH:

6.73

PEG Ratio

ETX:

0.60

CXH:

0.13

PS Ratio

ETX:

10.75

CXH:

6.93

PB Ratio

ETX:

1.01

CXH:

0.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

ETX:

$18.81M

CXH:

$9.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ETX:

$8.18M

CXH:

$8.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

ETX:

$16.49M

CXH:

$15.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than CXH's 2.28% return. Over the past 10 years, ETX has outperformed CXH with an annualized return of 3.64%, while CXH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.22% annualized return.


ETX

1D
1.09%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
0.50%
6M
-1.63%
1Y
7.12%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
3.64%

CXH

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
2.28%
6M
4.66%
1Y
6.43%
3Y*
7.26%
5Y*
0.24%
10Y*
2.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Often compared with ETX:
ETX vs. PMMETX vs. VTEB
Often compared with CXH:
CXH vs. SPY

Return for Risk

ETX vs. CXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETX
ETX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ETX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ETX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CXH
CXH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXH Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETX vs. CXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (ETX) and MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETXCXHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

0.87

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.05

1.24

-0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.18

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

1.03

+0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.44

2.26

+1.18

ETX vs. CXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the CXH Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETX and CXH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETXCXHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

0.87

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.02

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.17

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.35

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between ETX and CXH is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ETX vs. CXH - Dividend Comparison

ETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, more than CXH's 4.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETX
Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust
5.06%5.02%5.33%4.15%4.62%3.96%3.60%3.88%4.46%4.11%4.33%4.60%
CXH
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
4.92%4.70%3.84%3.63%4.75%4.77%4.77%4.63%5.28%4.90%5.19%5.14%

Drawdowns

ETX vs. CXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETX drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, smaller than the maximum CXH drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETX and CXH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ETXCXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.09%

-49.06%

+16.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.93%

-6.43%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-34.69%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.18%

-34.69%

+9.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.58%

-7.49%

+3.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-7.59%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.93%

-0.94%

Volatility

ETX vs. CXH - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (ETX) and MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH) have volatilities of 3.76% and 3.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ETXCXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.76%

3.59%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

4.68%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

7.44%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

9.91%

+3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.41%

12.89%

+1.52%

Financials

ETX vs. CXH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust and MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00M2.00M3.00M4.00M5.00M6.00M7.00M20212022202320242025
4.38M
3.31M
(ETX) Total Revenue
(CXH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items