PortfoliosLab logo
ETX vs. CXH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ETX and CXH is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ETX vs. CXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (ETX) and MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ETX:

0.56

CXH:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

ETX:

0.78

CXH:

0.95

Omega Ratio

ETX:

1.10

CXH:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

ETX:

0.28

CXH:

0.27

Martin Ratio

ETX:

1.68

CXH:

2.00

Ulcer Index

ETX:

2.30%

CXH:

2.92%

Daily Std Dev

ETX:

7.36%

CXH:

8.49%

Max Drawdown

ETX:

-32.09%

CXH:

-49.10%

Current Drawdown

ETX:

-9.78%

CXH:

-15.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ETX:

$199.11M

CXH:

$63.07M

EPS

ETX:

$0.61

CXH:

$0.88

PE Ratio

ETX:

29.98

CXH:

8.74

PEG Ratio

ETX:

0.00

CXH:

0.00

PS Ratio

ETX:

28.69

CXH:

11.88

PB Ratio

ETX:

0.98

CXH:

0.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

ETX:

$9.70M

CXH:

$4.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ETX:

$8.18M

CXH:

$4.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

ETX:

$7.33M

CXH:

$9.25M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETX achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly higher than CXH's -2.37% return. Over the past 10 years, ETX has outperformed CXH with an annualized return of 4.88%, while CXH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.71% annualized return.


ETX

YTD

4.87%

1M

2.94%

6M

0.96%

1Y

4.08%

5Y*

3.48%

10Y*

4.88%

CXH

YTD

-2.37%

1M

3.35%

6M

-2.41%

1Y

6.69%

5Y*

1.45%

10Y*

2.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ETX vs. CXH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETX is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETX is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETX is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETX is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETX is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETX is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

CXH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CXH is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CXH is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CXH is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CXH is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CXH is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CXH is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ETX vs. CXH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (ETX) and MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ETX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is comparable to the CXH Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETX and CXH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ETX vs. CXH - Dividend Comparison

ETX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than CXH's 4.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ETX
Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust
5.17%5.33%4.15%4.62%3.96%3.60%3.88%4.83%4.45%4.33%4.60%4.85%
CXH
MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust
4.60%3.92%3.63%4.76%4.77%4.79%4.67%5.28%4.92%5.24%5.15%5.62%

Drawdowns

ETX vs. CXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETX drawdown since its inception was -32.09%, smaller than the maximum CXH drawdown of -49.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETX and CXH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ETX vs. CXH - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust (ETX) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust (CXH) at 2.23%. This indicates that ETX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ETX vs. CXH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Municipal Income 2028 Term Trust and MFS Investment Grade Municipal Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00M2.00M3.00M4.00M5.00M6.00M7.00M20212022202320242025
4.74M
2.22M
(ETX) Total Revenue
(CXH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items