PortfoliosLab logo
ETW vs. QQQX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ETW and QQQX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

ETW vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ETW:

0.79

QQQX:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

ETW:

1.12

QQQX:

0.96

Omega Ratio

ETW:

1.17

QQQX:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

ETW:

0.83

QQQX:

0.58

Martin Ratio

ETW:

4.12

QQQX:

1.96

Ulcer Index

ETW:

3.26%

QQQX:

6.75%

Daily Std Dev

ETW:

18.99%

QQQX:

22.07%

Max Drawdown

ETW:

-54.13%

QQQX:

-57.24%

Current Drawdown

ETW:

-0.61%

QQQX:

-6.95%

Fundamentals

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETW achieves a 3.94% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's -4.48% return. Over the past 10 years, ETW has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 6.11%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.


ETW

YTD

3.94%

1M

3.38%

6M

2.92%

1Y

14.14%

3Y*

8.11%

5Y*

9.58%

10Y*

6.11%

QQQX

YTD

-4.48%

1M

4.30%

6M

0.01%

1Y

13.77%

3Y*

9.55%

5Y*

8.98%

10Y*

10.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ETW vs. QQQX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETW is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETW is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETW is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETW is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETW is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETW is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQX is 7070
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQX is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQX is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQX is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQX is 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQX is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ETW vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ETW Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETW and QQQX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ETW vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

ETW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than QQQX's 7.77% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ETW
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund
9.42%9.12%8.96%10.90%7.83%9.05%8.45%11.46%9.26%11.56%10.37%10.56%
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
7.77%6.73%7.26%9.65%5.86%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%7.07%

Drawdowns

ETW vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETW drawdown since its inception was -54.13%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETW and QQQX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ETW vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETW) is 2.54%, while Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that ETW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ETW vs. QQQX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Buy-Write Opportunities Fund and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


(ETW) Total Revenue
(QQQX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items