ETV vs. QYLD

In the year-to-date period, ETV achieves a -3.75% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's -8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ETV has outperformed QYLD with an annualized return of 7.88%, while QYLD has yielded a comparatively lower -3.27% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ETV Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of -0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETV and QYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ETV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.85%, less than QYLD's 13.72% yield.

The maximum ETV drawdown since its inception was -52.11%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -40.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETV and QYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Buy-Write Opportunities Fund (ETV) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.91%. This indicates that ETV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.