ETRN vs. ET

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Equitrans Midstream Corporation (ETRN) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

ETRN vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Equitrans Midstream Corporation (ETRN) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ETRN vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ETRN Equitrans Midstream Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	25.17%	65.24%	-30.12%	38.50%	-33.24%	-25.27%	2.67%
ET Energy Transfer LP	17.51%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-13.33%

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) ETRN : $1.42B ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) ETRN : $1.03B ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) ETRN : $1.38B ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

ETRN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ET

• 1D: -1.45%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 17.51%
• 6M: 16.34%
• 1Y: 9.61%
• 3Y*: 24.91%
• 5Y*: 29.13%
• 10Y*: 20.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ETRN vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 53
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETRN vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equitrans Midstream Corporation (ETRN) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ETRN	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.35	—

Correlation

The correlation between ETRN and ET is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ETRN vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

ETRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ETRN Equitrans Midstream Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	2.42%	5.89%	8.96%	5.80%	11.19%	13.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.97%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ETRN	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-87.81%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.33%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-72.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-3.30%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-25.95%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ETRN	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.02%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.78%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	23.83%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	25.47%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	36.63%	—

Financials