ETN vs. RMD

In the year-to-date period, ETN achieves a -12.65% return, which is significantly lower than RMD's 3.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ETN has outperformed RMD with an annualized return of 18.59%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively lower 15.45% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ETN Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the RMD Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETN and RMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, more than RMD's 0.88% yield.

The maximum ETN drawdown since its inception was -68.95%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -61.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETN and RMD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a higher volatility of 19.30% compared to ResMed Inc. (RMD) at 14.81%. This indicates that ETN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eaton Corporation plc and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.