ETMOX vs. CFMOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund (ETMOX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX).
ETMOX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Dec 6, 1993. CFMOX is managed by Commerce. It was launched on Feb 20, 1995.
Performance
ETMOX vs. CFMOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ETMOX vs. CFMOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETMOX Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund | -0.27% | 5.40% | 2.11% | 4.97% | -8.67% | 0.71% | 5.23% | 7.30% | 1.87% | 3.11% |
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.70% | 5.33% | 0.38% | 4.87% | -7.32% | 0.69% | 3.87% | 6.12% | 0.81% | 4.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETMOX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than CFMOX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ETMOX has outperformed CFMOX with an annualized return of 2.06%, while CFMOX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.65% annualized return.
ETMOX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -2.05%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.06%
CFMOX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 3.62%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETMOX vs. CFMOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETMOX has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CFMOX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ETMOX vs. CFMOX — Risk / Return Rank
ETMOX
CFMOX
ETMOX vs. CFMOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund (ETMOX) and Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETMOX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.91 | +0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.04 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 4.29 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETMOX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.91 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.18 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.50 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 1.20 | -0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between ETMOX and CFMOX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ETMOX vs. CFMOX - Dividend Comparison
ETMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than CFMOX's 2.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETMOX Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund | 3.42% | 4.24% | 4.07% | 3.06% | 2.46% | 1.95% | 2.47% | 3.39% | 3.25% | 3.51% | 3.58% | 3.60% |
CFMOX Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund | 2.62% | 3.41% | 2.16% | 2.11% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.33% | 2.44% | 2.48% | 2.46% | 2.43% |
Drawdowns
ETMOX vs. CFMOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETMOX drawdown since its inception was -21.73%, which is greater than CFMOX's maximum drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETMOX and CFMOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETMOX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.73% | -12.14% | -9.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.76% | -4.58% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.84% | -12.14% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.84% | -12.14% | -1.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -2.47% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.32% | -1.42% | -0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.31% | 1.11% | +0.20% |
Volatility
ETMOX vs. CFMOX - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Missouri Municipal Income Fund (ETMOX) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to Commerce Missouri Tax-Free Intermediate Bond Fund (CFMOX) at 1.09%. This indicates that ETMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFMOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ETMOX | CFMOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 1.09% | +0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.70% | 1.48% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.83% | 4.51% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 3.42% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 3.31% | +0.61% |