ETHU vs. IWM
ETHU (Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHU is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. ETHU is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Over the past year, ETHU returned -76.14% vs 41.60% for IWM. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ETHU charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
ETHU vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHU achieves a -72.13% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 18.84% return.
ETHU
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -45.48%
- YTD
- -72.13%
- 6M
- -75.88%
- 1Y
- -76.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 18.84%
- 6M
- 16.56%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.00%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
ETHU vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | -72.13% | -64.38% | -49.29% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 18.84% | 12.66% | 10.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHU and IWM is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHU vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
ETHU
IWM
ETHU vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHU | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.36 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | 3.79 | -4.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 13.45 | -14.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHU | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 2.18 | -2.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.54 | 0.37 | -0.91 |
Drawdowns
ETHU vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHU drawdown since its inception was -95.18%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHU and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHU | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.18% | -59.05% | -36.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.80% | -11.03% | -80.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.18% | -0.01% | -95.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.45% | -10.77% | -58.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.60% | 3.10% | +59.50% |
Volatility
ETHU vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF (ETHU) has a higher volatility of 20.02% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 5.70%. This indicates that ETHU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHU | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.02% | 5.70% | +14.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.47% | 13.60% | +78.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 137.43% | 19.19% | +118.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 142.96% | 22.53% | +120.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 142.96% | 23.04% | +119.92% |
ETHU vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHU has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHU vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
ETHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than IWM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHU Volatility Shares 2x Ether ETF | 5.16% | 2.31% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHU and IWM have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETHU has higher volatility (20.02%) compared to IWM (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHU dropped -95.18% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 1-year performance, IWM leads with 41.60% vs -76.14% for ETHU. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 5.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IWM has performed better with a 41.60% return vs -76.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ETHU.
ETHU has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.87% for IWM.
ETHU is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ETHU and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHU and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer