PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHO vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHO vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.21% return.


ETHO

1D
-0.81%
1M
4.96%
YTD
17.28%
6M
16.47%
1Y
34.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IEMG

1D
-1.34%
1M
7.97%
YTD
26.21%
6M
28.63%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHO vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
ETHO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
17.28%10.23%8.17%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.21%32.56%9.89%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHO and IEMG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.61

The correlation between ETHO and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

ETHO vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ETHO
IEMG

Technology

26.3%
35.0%

Industrials

16.7%
9.0%

Financial Services

13.0%
18.4%

Healthcare

11.6%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.5%

Real Estate

6.5%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.3%

Communication Services

4.5%
6.4%

Basic Materials

3.1%
6.9%

Utilities

2.5%
2.2%

Energy

0.4%
3.8%

Technology

ETHO
26.3%
IEMG
35.0%

Industrials

ETHO
16.7%
IEMG
9.0%

Financial Services

ETHO
13.0%
IEMG
18.4%

Healthcare

ETHO
11.6%
IEMG
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

ETHO
10.8%
IEMG
9.5%

Real Estate

ETHO
6.5%
IEMG
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

ETHO
4.7%
IEMG
3.3%

Communication Services

ETHO
4.5%
IEMG
6.4%

Basic Materials

ETHO
3.1%
IEMG
6.9%

Utilities

ETHO
2.5%
IEMG
2.2%

Energy

ETHO
0.4%
IEMG
3.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHO vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHO
ETHO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ETHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHO vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ETHOIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.00

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.52

15.38

-0.86

ETHO vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHO Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHO and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ETHOIEMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.97

2.72

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.35

+0.44

Drawdowns

ETHO vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHOIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.50%

-38.71%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.25%

-13.21%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.34%

+0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-12.97%

+8.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

3.43%

-1.05%

Volatility

ETHO vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 4.11%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHOIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

8.31%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.77%

16.93%

-4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.64%

19.43%

-1.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.40%

18.38%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

20.03%

-0.63%

ETHO vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

ETHO vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IEMG's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETHO
Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF
0.73%0.86%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.18%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHO and IEMG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to ETHO (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 1-year performance, IEMG leads with 52.58% vs 34.51% for ETHO. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 52.58% return vs 34.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETHO.

IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.73% for ETHO.

ETHO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.09% for IEMG.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHO and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer