ETHO vs. IEMG
ETHO (Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ETHO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Etho Climate Leadership Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ETHO returned 34.51% vs 52.58% for IEMG. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ETHO charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
ETHO vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ETHO achieves a 17.28% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 26.21% return.
ETHO
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 17.28%
- 6M
- 16.47%
- 1Y
- 34.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 52.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
ETHO vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 17.28% | 10.23% | 8.17% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 26.21% | 32.56% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between ETHO and IEMG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between ETHO and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
ETHO vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ETHO
IEMG
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
ETHO
IEMG
Industrials
ETHO
IEMG
Financial Services
ETHO
IEMG
Healthcare
ETHO
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
ETHO
IEMG
Real Estate
ETHO
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
ETHO
IEMG
Communication Services
ETHO
IEMG
Basic Materials
ETHO
IEMG
Utilities
ETHO
IEMG
Energy
ETHO
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ETHO vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
ETHO
IEMG
ETHO vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ETHO | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.50 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 4.00 | -0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.52 | 15.38 | -0.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ETHO | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.72 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.35 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
ETHO vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETHO drawdown since its inception was -25.50%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHO and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ETHO | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.50% | -38.71% | +13.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.25% | -13.21% | +3.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.34% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -12.97% | +8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 3.43% | -1.05% |
Volatility
ETHO vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF (ETHO) is 4.11%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that ETHO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ETHO | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 8.31% | -4.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 16.93% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.64% | 19.43% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 18.38% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.40% | 20.03% | -0.63% |
ETHO vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETHO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ETHO vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
ETHO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than IEMG's 2.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETHO Amplify Etho Climate Leadership U.S. ETF | 0.73% | 0.86% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.18% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ETHO and IEMG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to ETHO (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHO dropped -25.50% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 1-year performance, IEMG leads with 52.58% vs 34.51% for ETHO. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ETHO has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 52.58% return vs 34.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for ETHO.
IEMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.18%, compared with 0.73% for ETHO.
ETHO is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. ETHO tracks Etho Climate Leadership Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ETHO and 0.09% for IEMG.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ETHO and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer