ETC-USD vs. XLM-USD

In the year-to-date period, ETC-USD achieves a 3.74% return, which is significantly lower than XLM-USD's 22.74% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ethereum Classic (ETC-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ETC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio of 4.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETC-USD and XLM-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum ETC-USD drawdown since its inception was -92.12%, roughly equal to the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETC-USD and XLM-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Ethereum Classic (ETC-USD) is 22.73%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 35.98%. This indicates that ETC-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.