ETC-USD vs. XLM-USD

In the year-to-date period, ETC-USD achieves a -35.12% return, which is significantly lower than XLM-USD's -21.76% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ethereum Classic (ETC-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ETC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETC-USD and XLM-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum ETC-USD drawdown since its inception was -92.12%, roughly equal to the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETC-USD and XLM-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Ethereum Classic (ETC-USD) and Stellar (XLM-USD) have volatilities of 18.17% and 18.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.