PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ET vs. VALE
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ETVALE
YTD Return16.55%-19.82%
1Y Return33.89%-4.81%
3Y Return (Ann)32.63%-5.40%
5Y Return (Ann)10.96%9.09%
10Y Return (Ann)3.82%5.06%
Sharpe Ratio2.31-0.20
Daily Std Dev14.81%30.47%
Max Drawdown-87.81%-93.21%
Current Drawdown-6.24%-34.19%

Fundamentals


ETVALE
Market Cap$53.75B$52.56B
EPS$1.09$1.81
PE Ratio14.646.78
PEG Ratio0.5810.64
Revenue (TTM)$78.59B$206.12B
Gross Profit (TTM)$13.42B$102.31B
EBITDA (TTM)$12.69B$84.44B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ET and VALE is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ET vs. VALE - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly higher than VALE's -19.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has underperformed VALE with an annualized return of 3.82%, while VALE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
847.76%
146.84%
ET
VALE

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Energy Transfer LP

Vale S.A.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ET vs. VALE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Vale S.A. (VALE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ET
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ET, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ET, currently valued at 3.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.08
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ET, currently valued at 19.16, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0019.16
VALE
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VALE, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.20
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VALE, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.09
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VALE, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VALE, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VALE, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.53

ET vs. VALE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the VALE Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ET and VALE.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
2.31
-0.20
ET
VALE

Dividends

ET vs. VALE - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.91%, less than VALE's 11.66% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.91%8.95%7.33%7.41%17.27%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%
VALE
Vale S.A.
11.66%7.75%8.59%19.70%2.73%2.63%4.16%3.32%0.56%8.84%6.69%5.73%

Drawdowns

ET vs. VALE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, smaller than the maximum VALE drawdown of -93.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and VALE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-6.24%
-34.19%
ET
VALE

Volatility

ET vs. VALE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 4.55%, while Vale S.A. (VALE) has a volatility of 9.67%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VALE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
4.55%
9.67%
ET
VALE

Financials

ET vs. VALE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Vale S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items