PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ET vs. SPY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ET vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Transfer LP (ET) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1,004.93%
561.99%
ET
SPY

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 35.81% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 24.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 2.15%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.


ET

YTD

35.81%

1M

7.35%

6M

12.60%

1Y

38.63%

5Y (annualized)

19.22%

10Y (annualized)

2.15%

SPY

YTD

24.40%

1M

0.59%

6M

11.33%

1Y

31.86%

5Y (annualized)

15.23%

10Y (annualized)

13.04%

Key characteristics


ETSPY
Sharpe Ratio2.552.64
Sortino Ratio3.643.53
Omega Ratio1.461.49
Calmar Ratio1.743.81
Martin Ratio21.0517.21
Ulcer Index1.91%1.86%
Daily Std Dev15.78%12.15%
Max Drawdown-87.81%-55.19%
Current Drawdown-0.06%-2.17%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between ET and SPY is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ET vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ET, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.002.552.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for ET, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.643.53
The chart of Omega ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.461.49
The chart of Calmar ratio for ET, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.743.81
The chart of Martin ratio for ET, currently valued at 21.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0021.0517.21
ET
SPY

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and SPY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.55
2.64
ET
SPY

Dividends

ET vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, more than SPY's 1.20% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.38%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%
SPY
SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.20%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%1.87%1.81%

Drawdowns

ET vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.06%
-2.17%
ET
SPY

Volatility

ET vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Energy Transfer LP (ET) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.27%
4.08%
ET
SPY