ET vs. MO
ET (Energy Transfer LP) and MO (Altria Group, Inc.) are both stocks. ET operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while MO operates in Tobacco (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, ET returned 12.65%/yr vs 7.78%/yr for MO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ET vs. MO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ET having a 22.86% return and MO slightly higher at 23.96%. Over the past 10 years, ET has outperformed MO with an annualized return of 12.65%, while MO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.
ET
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 22.86%
- 6M
- 21.25%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 24.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.65%
MO
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- 23.96%
- 6M
- 24.61%
- 1Y
- 24.64%
- 3Y*
- 25.16%
- 5Y*
- 15.82%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
ET vs. MO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 22.86% | -9.37% | 53.87% | 27.87% | 55.74% | 42.96% | -44.92% | 5.88% | -17.74% | -4.66% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 23.96% | 18.17% | 40.76% | -3.70% | 4.37% | 24.18% | -10.21% | 7.87% | -27.14% | 9.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ET and MO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2006 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ET and MO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ET:
$67.59B
MO:
$117.61B
ET:
$1.36
MO:
$4.79
ET:
14.36
MO:
14.66
ET:
0.78
MO:
5.41
ET:
$89.38B
MO:
$21.82B
ET:
$20.48B
MO:
$14.80B
ET:
$13.02B
MO:
$11.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ET vs. MO — Risk / Return Rank
ET
MO
ET vs. MO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ET | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.22 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 1.51 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.90 | 3.82 | +0.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ET | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.09 | 1.10 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 0.77 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.34 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.69 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
ET vs. MO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than MO's maximum drawdown of -65.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and MO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ET | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.81% | -65.43% | -22.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -16.40% | +6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.56% | -16.40% | -8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.82% | -25.83% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.82% | -53.69% | -19.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -5.70% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.75% | -11.93% | -13.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.55% | 6.48% | -1.93% |
Volatility
ET vs. MO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 5.97%, while Altria Group, Inc. (MO) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ET | MO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.97% | 7.41% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.89% | 17.18% | -5.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.42% | 22.42% | -6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.90% | 20.63% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.04% | 22.94% | +12.10% |
Dividends
ET vs. MO - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.83%, more than MO's 5.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.83% | 7.97% | 6.51% | 8.95% | 7.33% | 7.41% | 17.27% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% |
MO Altria Group, Inc. | 5.97% | 7.21% | 7.65% | 9.52% | 8.05% | 7.43% | 8.29% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 3.56% | 3.48% | 3.73% |
Financials
ET vs. MO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ET vs. MO - Profitability Comparison
ET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 6.62B and revenue of 27.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.
MO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.51B and revenue of 5.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.6%.
ET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.98B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
MO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.96B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 54.5%.
ET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.25B and revenue of 27.77B, resulting in a net margin of 4.5%.
MO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Altria Group, Inc. reported a net income of 2.18B and revenue of 5.43B, resulting in a net margin of 40.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ET and MO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MO has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to ET (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ET dropped -87.81% vs MO's -65.43%.
MO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ET and MO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer