ET vs. MO

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a -9.48% return, which is significantly lower than MO's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ET has underperformed MO with an annualized return of 1.76%, while MO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Altria Group, Inc. (MO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the MO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and MO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than MO's 6.93% yield.

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than MO's maximum drawdown of -57.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and MO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a higher volatility of 16.28% compared to Altria Group, Inc. (MO) at 7.10%. This indicates that ET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Altria Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.