PortfoliosLab logo
ET vs. KHC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ET and KHC is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ET vs. KHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Transfer LP (ET) and The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ET:

0.85

KHC:

-0.94

Sortino Ratio

ET:

1.26

KHC:

-1.28

Omega Ratio

ET:

1.17

KHC:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

ET:

0.92

KHC:

-0.36

Martin Ratio

ET:

2.97

KHC:

-1.80

Ulcer Index

ET:

7.63%

KHC:

11.85%

Daily Std Dev

ET:

27.54%

KHC:

22.59%

Max Drawdown

ET:

-87.81%

KHC:

-76.07%

Current Drawdown

ET:

-10.77%

KHC:

-59.48%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ET:

$61.77B

KHC:

$32.65B

EPS

ET:

$1.32

KHC:

$2.19

PE Ratio

ET:

13.64

KHC:

12.60

PEG Ratio

ET:

0.80

KHC:

0.98

PS Ratio

ET:

0.75

KHC:

1.28

PB Ratio

ET:

1.75

KHC:

0.67

Total Revenue (TTM)

ET:

$82.06B

KHC:

$25.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ET:

$14.68B

KHC:

$8.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

ET:

$13.56B

KHC:

$2.72B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a -3.99% return, which is significantly higher than KHC's -10.38% return.


ET

YTD

-3.99%

1M

10.04%

6M

9.99%

1Y

23.19%

5Y*

31.32%

10Y*

1.99%

KHC

YTD

-10.38%

1M

-8.83%

6M

-13.26%

1Y

-21.19%

5Y*

3.09%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ET vs. KHC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

KHC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KHC is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KHC is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KHC is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KHC is 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KHC is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KHC is 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ET vs. KHC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ET Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the KHC Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ET and KHC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ET vs. KHC - Dividend Comparison

ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than KHC's 5.89% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.13%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%
KHC
The Kraft Heinz Company
5.89%5.21%4.33%3.93%4.46%4.62%4.98%5.81%3.15%2.69%2.34%0.00%

Drawdowns

ET vs. KHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than KHC's maximum drawdown of -76.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and KHC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ET vs. KHC - Volatility Comparison

Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a higher volatility of 11.63% compared to The Kraft Heinz Company (KHC) at 5.98%. This indicates that ET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ET vs. KHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and The Kraft Heinz Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
21.02B
6.00B
(ET) Total Revenue
(KHC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ET vs. KHC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Transfer LP and The Kraft Heinz Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20212022202320242025
19.4%
34.4%
(ET) Gross Margin
(KHC) Gross Margin
ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

KHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Kraft Heinz Company reported a gross profit of 2.06B and revenue of 6.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

KHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Kraft Heinz Company reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

KHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Kraft Heinz Company reported a net income of 712.00M and revenue of 6.00B, resulting in a net margin of 11.9%.