ET vs. AMBP
Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ET or AMBP.
Performance
ET vs. AMBP - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ET achieves a 35.81% return, which is significantly higher than AMBP's 2.50% return.
ET
35.81%
7.35%
12.60%
38.63%
19.22%
2.15%
AMBP
2.50%
-14.62%
-5.59%
6.74%
N/A
N/A
Fundamentals
| ET | AMBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $58.38B | $2.21B |
| EPS | $1.36 | -$0.12 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $83.66B | $4.85B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $14.03B | $530.00M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $12.39B | $633.00M |
Key characteristics
| ET | AMBP | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.55 | 0.32 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.64 | 0.67 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.74 | 0.16 |
| Martin Ratio | 21.05 | 1.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.91% | 9.28% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.78% | 33.86% |
| Max Drawdown | -87.81% | -75.71% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.06% | -61.86% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between ET and AMBP is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ET vs. AMBP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Transfer LP (ET) and Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ET vs. AMBP - Dividend Comparison
ET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.38%, less than AMBP's 11.05% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET Energy Transfer LP | 7.38% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
AMBP Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. | 11.05% | 10.42% | 6.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ET vs. AMBP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ET drawdown since its inception was -87.81%, which is greater than AMBP's maximum drawdown of -75.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ET and AMBP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ET vs. AMBP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Transfer LP (ET) is 4.27%, while Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A. (AMBP) has a volatility of 10.25%. This indicates that ET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ET vs. AMBP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Transfer LP and Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities