Correlation
The correlation between ESIF.L and SSAC.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L).
ESIF.L and SSAC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESIF.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on Nov 18, 2020. SSAC.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Oct 21, 2011. Both ESIF.L and SSAC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESIF.L or SSAC.L.
Performance
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
ESIF.L:
1.91
SSAC.L:
0.42
ESIF.L:
2.46
SSAC.L:
0.68
ESIF.L:
1.36
SSAC.L:
1.10
ESIF.L:
2.33
SSAC.L:
0.36
ESIF.L:
11.79
SSAC.L:
1.27
ESIF.L:
2.82%
SSAC.L:
5.11%
ESIF.L:
17.16%
SSAC.L:
14.80%
ESIF.L:
-23.55%
SSAC.L:
-25.43%
ESIF.L:
-0.99%
SSAC.L:
-7.15%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESIF.L achieves a 26.55% return, which is significantly higher than SSAC.L's -2.77% return.
ESIF.L
26.55%
5.57%
29.03%
32.92%
23.84%
N/A
N/A
SSAC.L
-2.77%
5.87%
-3.98%
6.21%
9.94%
11.22%
10.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESIF.L has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SSAC.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ESIF.L
SSAC.L
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESIF.L nor SSAC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESIF.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, smaller than the maximum SSAC.L drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESIF.L and SSAC.L.
Loading data...
Volatility
ESIF.L vs. SSAC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe Financials Sector UCITS ETF (ESIF.L) is 3.20%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (SSAC.L) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that ESIF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...