PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ESGU vs. DFAC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU and DFAC is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 1.0

Performance

ESGU vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
19.25%
17.49%
ESGU
DFAC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ESGU:

-0.14

DFAC:

-0.29

Sortino Ratio

ESGU:

-0.08

DFAC:

-0.27

Omega Ratio

ESGU:

0.99

DFAC:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

ESGU:

-0.13

DFAC:

-0.26

Martin Ratio

ESGU:

-0.66

DFAC:

-1.22

Ulcer Index

ESGU:

3.46%

DFAC:

3.80%

Daily Std Dev

ESGU:

16.18%

DFAC:

15.99%

Max Drawdown

ESGU:

-33.87%

DFAC:

-23.11%

Current Drawdown

ESGU:

-17.70%

DFAC:

-18.07%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ESGU having a -14.20% return and DFAC slightly higher at -13.55%.


ESGU

YTD

-14.20%

1M

-13.25%

6M

-11.94%

1Y

-1.14%

5Y*

16.32%

10Y*

N/A

DFAC

YTD

-13.55%

1M

-12.54%

6M

-12.50%

1Y

-3.55%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESGU vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Expense ratio chart for DFAC: current value is 0.19%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DFAC: 0.19%
Expense ratio chart for ESGU: current value is 0.15%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
ESGU: 0.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ESGU vs. DFAC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ESGU is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ESGU is 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ESGU is 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ESGU is 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ESGU is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ESGU is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DFAC is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DFAC is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DFAC is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DFAC is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DFAC is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DFAC is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ESGU vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ESGU, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.00
ESGU: -0.14
DFAC: -0.29
The chart of Sortino ratio for ESGU, currently valued at -0.08, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
ESGU: -0.08
DFAC: -0.27
The chart of Omega ratio for ESGU, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
ESGU: 0.99
DFAC: 0.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for ESGU, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00
ESGU: -0.13
DFAC: -0.26
The chart of Martin ratio for ESGU, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00
ESGU: -0.66
DFAC: -1.22

The current ESGU Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU and DFAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.14
-0.29
ESGU
DFAC

Dividends

ESGU vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison

ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than DFAC's 1.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
ESGU
iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF
1.33%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.81%1.82%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
1.25%1.03%1.20%1.50%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ESGU vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and DFAC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-17.70%
-18.07%
ESGU
DFAC

Volatility

ESGU vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) have volatilities of 9.41% and 9.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.41%
9.30%
ESGU
DFAC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab