PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ESGU vs. DFAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ESGU vs. DFAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ESGU vs. DFAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ESGU
iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF
-4.83%16.90%24.31%25.79%-20.27%11.47%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
-1.60%15.66%19.61%21.96%-14.93%9.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGU achieves a -4.83% return, which is significantly lower than DFAC's -1.60% return.


ESGU

1D
2.93%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
-4.83%
6M
-2.32%
1Y
17.24%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*

DFAC

1D
2.78%
1M
-4.86%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
1.24%
1Y
19.05%
3Y*
16.43%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESGU vs. DFAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAC's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

ESGU vs. DFAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGU
ESGU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ESGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAC
DFAC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAC Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGU vs. DFAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ESGUDFACDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.92

1.03

-0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.42

1.56

-0.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.54

-0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.77

7.28

-0.51

ESGU vs. DFAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is comparable to the DFAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGU and DFAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ESGUDFACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

1.03

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.55

+0.19

Correlation

The correlation between ESGU and DFAC is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

ESGU vs. DFAC - Dividend Comparison

ESGU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than DFAC's 1.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESGU
iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF
1.07%0.99%1.18%1.43%1.58%1.06%1.27%1.32%1.73%1.82%
DFAC
Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
1.03%0.97%1.03%1.20%1.50%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ESGU vs. DFAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGU drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than DFAC's maximum drawdown of -23.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGU and DFAC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ESGUDFACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-23.12%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.35%

-12.79%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.59%

-5.94%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.96%

-5.62%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

2.71%

-0.06%

Volatility

ESGU vs. DFAC - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG MSCI USA ETF (ESGU) and Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) have volatilities of 5.42% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ESGUDFACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

5.31%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

9.59%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.75%

18.51%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

17.30%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.70%

17.30%

+1.40%