ESGG vs. GABF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. ESGG is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGG returned 20.59%/yr vs 21.50%/yr for GABF. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.

Performance

ESGG vs. GABF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's -4.42% return.

ESGG

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 12.47%
• 6M: 12.09%
• 1Y: 27.53%
• 3Y*: 20.59%
• 5Y*: 12.18%
• 10Y*: —

GABF

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: -4.42%
• 6M: -5.68%
• 1Y: -1.50%
• 3Y*: 21.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGG vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund	12.47%	24.01%	14.48%	25.57%	-1.43%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	-4.42%	3.60%	44.38%	38.92%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGG and GABF is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.75

The correlation between ESGG and GABF shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGG vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ESGG	GABF
Technology	40.5%	5.2%
Financial Services	19.5%	85.6%
Healthcare	13.1%	-
Industrials	6.6%	4.9%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.7%	-
Energy	3.8%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Real Estate	1.4%	4.3%
Communication Services	1.4%	-

Return for Risk

ESGG vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGG

ESGG Risk / Return Rank: 71
ESGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
ESGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ESGG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ESGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ESGG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

GABF

GABF Risk / Return Rank: 8
GABF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Omega Ratio Rank: 7
GABF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GABF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGG vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ESGG	GABF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	-0.09	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	0.00	+3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.00	+0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	-0.09	+3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.01	-0.20	+13.21

ESGG vs. GABF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGG Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the GABF Sharpe Ratio of -0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGG and GABF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ESGG vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and GABF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGG	GABF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.31%	-20.86%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.16%	-17.16%	+8.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-20.86%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-9.12%	+6.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.65%	-4.90%	+0.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	7.55%	-5.43%

Volatility

ESGG vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) at 4.38%. This indicates that ESGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGG	GABF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.30%	4.38%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.68%	13.29%	-2.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	17.47%	-4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.15%	20.48%	-4.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.53%	20.48%	-3.95%

ESGG vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGG vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison

ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than GABF's 2.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund	1.31%	1.39%	1.84%	1.73%	1.83%	1.34%	1.36%	1.94%	2.12%	1.71%	0.87%
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF	2.05%	1.96%	4.19%	4.95%	1.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ESGG and GABF in my portfolio?

ESGG and GABF have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ESGG or GABF?

ESGG has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to GABF (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs GABF's -20.86%.

Which ETF is better, ESGG or GABF?

On 3-year performance, GABF leads with 21.50% vs 20.59% for ESGG. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, GABF has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ESGG or GABF?

Over the 3-year period, GABF has performed better with a 21.50% return vs 20.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ESGG or GABF?

GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ESGG or GABF?

GABF has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 1.31% for ESGG.

What is the main difference between ESGG and GABF?

ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.10% for GABF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.