ESGG vs. GABF
ESGG (FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund) and GABF (Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global ESG Select KPIs Index, while GABF is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Gabelli. ESGG is passively managed, while GABF is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ESGG returned 20.42%/yr vs 19.89%/yr for GABF. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ESGG charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GABF.
Performance
ESGG vs. GABF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGG achieves a 14.95% return, which is significantly higher than GABF's 0.15% return.
ESGG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.88%
GABF
- 1D
- 2.12%
- 1M
- 2.01%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 0.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.89%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $88.70K | $102.70K | $84.24K | |
| $107.51K | $101.42K | $192.29K |
ESGG vs. GABF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 14.95% | 24.01% | 14.48% | 25.57% | -1.43% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 0.15% | 3.60% | 44.38% | 38.92% | -0.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGG and GABF is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ESGG and GABF shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGG vs. GABF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGG
GABF
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Technology
ESGG
GABF
Financial Services
ESGG
GABF
Healthcare
ESGG
GABF
-
Industrials
ESGG
GABF
Consumer Defensive
ESGG
GABF
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESGG
GABF
-
Energy
ESGG
GABF
-
Basic Materials
ESGG
GABF
-
Utilities
ESGG
GABF
-
Communication Services
ESGG
GABF
-
Real Estate
ESGG
GABF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGG vs. GABF — Risk / Return Rank
ESGG
GABF
ESGG vs. GABF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) and Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESGG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.02 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.03 | +2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 0.06 | +12.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESGG vs. GABF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGG drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than GABF's maximum drawdown of -20.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGG and GABF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -20.86% | -11.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | -17.16% | +8.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -20.86% | +4.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -4.77% | +4.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.61% | -4.97% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 7.90% | -5.73% |
Volatility
ESGG vs. GABF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund (ESGG) is 4.19%, while Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF (GABF) has a volatility of 4.88%. This indicates that ESGG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GABF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGG | GABF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 4.88% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 13.34% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.24% | 17.50% | -4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 20.39% | -4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.55% | 20.39% | -3.84% |
ESGG vs. GABF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGG has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GABF's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGG vs. GABF - Dividend Comparison
ESGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, less than GABF's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGG FlexShares STOXX Global ESG Select Index Fund | 1.28% | 1.39% | 1.84% | 1.73% | 1.83% | 1.34% | 1.36% | 1.94% | 2.12% | 1.71% | 0.87% |
GABF Gabelli Financial Services Opportunities ETF | 1.96% | 1.96% | 4.19% | 4.95% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGG and GABF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GABF has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to ESGG (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGG dropped -32.31% vs GABF's -20.86%.
On 3-year performance, ESGG leads with 20.42% vs 19.89% for GABF. On fees, GABF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ESGG has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ESGG has performed better with a 20.42% return vs 19.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GABF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for ESGG.
GABF has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.28% for ESGG.
ESGG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GABF is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Gabelli. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for ESGG and 0.10% for GABF.
ESGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGG and GABF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer