ESGE vs. GLD
ESGE (iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGE returned 6.83%/yr vs 18.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
ESGE vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGE achieves a 26.85% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 2.92% return.
ESGE
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- YTD
- 26.85%
- 6M
- 29.21%
- 1Y
- 55.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.83%
- 10Y*
- —
GLD
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 5.43%
- 1Y
- 32.04%
- 3Y*
- 31.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
ESGE vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 26.85% | 35.86% | 6.63% | 9.51% | -22.41% | -2.87% | 18.60% | 20.37% | -15.24% | 38.86% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 2.92% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGE and GLD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2016 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ESGE and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ESGE vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ESGE
GLD
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
ESGE
GLD
-
Financial Services
ESGE
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
ESGE
GLD
-
Communication Services
ESGE
GLD
-
Industrials
ESGE
GLD
-
Basic Materials
ESGE
GLD
Healthcare
ESGE
GLD
-
Energy
ESGE
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
ESGE
GLD
-
Utilities
ESGE
GLD
-
Real Estate
ESGE
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESGE vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
ESGE
GLD
ESGE vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.24 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.98 | 1.68 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.51 | 4.15 | +11.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 1.21 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.01 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.60 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
ESGE vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGE drawdown since its inception was -41.07%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGE and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.07% | -45.56% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -19.21% | +5.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.71% | -19.21% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.23% | -21.03% | -18.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.23% | -17.75% | +16.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.47% | -16.16% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 7.73% | -4.17% |
Volatility
ESGE vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF (ESGE) has a higher volatility of 8.56% compared to SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) at 5.51%. This indicates that ESGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESGE | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.56% | 5.51% | +3.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.46% | 23.16% | -5.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.10% | 26.61% | -6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.11% | 18.00% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 15.95% | +3.99% |
ESGE vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ESGE vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
ESGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGE iShares ESG Aware MSCI EM ETF | 1.97% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 2.64% | 2.68% | 2.66% | 1.31% | 2.59% | 2.19% | 1.86% | 0.27% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ESGE and GLD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESGE has higher volatility (8.56%) compared to GLD (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESGE dropped -41.07% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 5-year performance, GLD leads with 18.15% vs 6.83% for ESGE. On fees, ESGE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GLD has been the lower-risk option at 5.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GLD has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ESGE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.
ESGE has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
ESGE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while GLD is Gold. ESGE tracks MSCI EM Extended ESG Focus Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for ESGE and 0.40% for GLD.
ESGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESGE and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer