PortfoliosLab logo
ESEB vs. BLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ESEB and BLV is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

ESEB vs. BLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG Emerging Markets Sovereign ETF (ESEB) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


ESEB

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BLV

YTD

0.47%

1M

-0.21%

6M

-1.23%

1Y

0.72%

5Y*

-4.88%

10Y*

1.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ESEB vs. BLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESEB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BLV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ESEB vs. BLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESEB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ESEB is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ESEB is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ESEB is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ESEB is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ESEB is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ESEB is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

BLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLV is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLV is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLV is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLV is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLV is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLV is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ESEB vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG Emerging Markets Sovereign ETF (ESEB) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

ESEB vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison

ESEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ESEB
Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG Emerging Markets Sovereign ETF
0.00%0.85%6.07%5.06%4.00%3.53%4.46%4.62%4.53%4.99%4.59%0.00%
BLV
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
4.72%4.68%4.06%4.17%3.37%5.84%3.57%4.07%3.63%4.16%4.37%3.90%

Drawdowns

ESEB vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Volatility

ESEB vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...