ESE.PA vs. VFV.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO).
ESE.PA and VFV.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESE.PA is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 16, 2013. VFV.TO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Nov 2, 2012. Both ESE.PA and VFV.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESE.PA or VFV.TO.
Key characteristics
ESE.PA | VFV.TO | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | 26.21% | 29.06% |
1Y Return | 39.30% | 43.27% |
3Y Return (Ann) | 11.88% | 13.86% |
5Y Return (Ann) | 15.94% | 16.64% |
10Y Return (Ann) | 14.94% | 15.31% |
Sharpe Ratio | 3.28 | 4.04 |
Sortino Ratio | 4.29 | 5.45 |
Omega Ratio | 1.67 | 1.76 |
Calmar Ratio | 4.35 | 5.65 |
Martin Ratio | 19.82 | 27.85 |
Ulcer Index | 1.83% | 1.55% |
Daily Std Dev | 11.06% | 10.68% |
Max Drawdown | -36.74% | -27.43% |
Current Drawdown | -0.37% | -0.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESE.PA and VFV.TO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ESE.PA vs. VFV.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ESE.PA achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly lower than VFV.TO's 29.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ESE.PA having a 14.94% annualized return and VFV.TO not far ahead at 15.31%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESE.PA vs. VFV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESE.PA has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VFV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ESE.PA vs. VFV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) and Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ESE.PA vs. VFV.TO - Dividend Comparison
ESE.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.20% | 1.31% | 1.06% | 1.33% | 1.55% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.66% | 1.63% | 1.48% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
ESE.PA vs. VFV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESE.PA drawdown since its inception was -36.74%, which is greater than VFV.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESE.PA and VFV.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ESE.PA vs. VFV.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy S&P 500 UCITS ETF (ESE.PA) is 1.68%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF (VFV.TO) has a volatility of 2.38%. This indicates that ESE.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.