ESAB vs. WSM
ESAB (ESAB Corp) and WSM (Williams-Sonoma, Inc.) are both stocks. ESAB operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while WSM operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, ESAB returned 17.77%/yr vs 58.20%/yr for WSM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ESAB vs. WSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESAB achieves a -8.36% return, which is significantly lower than WSM's 27.49% return.
ESAB
- 1D
- -3.69%
- 1M
- 11.38%
- YTD
- -8.36%
- 6M
- -10.72%
- 1Y
- -11.23%
- 3Y*
- 17.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WSM
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 17.43%
- YTD
- 27.49%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- 44.40%
- 3Y*
- 58.20%
- 5Y*
- 25.80%
- 10Y*
- 26.98%
ESAB vs. WSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESAB ESAB Corp | -8.36% | -6.55% | 38.86% | 85.23% | -5.81% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 27.49% | -2.09% | 86.56% | 80.24% | -20.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESAB and WSM is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2022 | 0.46 |
Fundamentals
ESAB:
$4.52
WSM:
$8.93
ESAB:
22.63
WSM:
25.32
ESAB:
1.07K
WSM:
5.12
ESAB:
1.61
WSM:
3.50
ESAB:
$2.91B
WSM:
$7.88B
ESAB:
$1.03B
WSM:
$3.63B
ESAB:
$456.09M
WSM:
$1.49B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESAB vs. WSM — Risk / Return Rank
ESAB
WSM
ESAB vs. WSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ESAB Corp (ESAB) and Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESAB | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.22 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 1.92 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 4.35 | -4.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESAB vs. WSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESAB drawdown since its inception was -41.08%, smaller than the maximum WSM drawdown of -89.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESAB and WSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESAB | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.08% | -89.01% | +47.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.43% | -23.27% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.43% | -36.79% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -51.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.06% | -0.49% | -23.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.35% | -25.02% | +13.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.71% | 10.25% | +8.46% |
Volatility
ESAB vs. WSM - Volatility Comparison
ESAB Corp (ESAB) has a higher volatility of 16.15% compared to Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) at 11.58%. This indicates that ESAB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESAB | WSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.15% | 11.58% | +4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.65% | 25.83% | +7.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.53% | 34.74% | +8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.33% | 44.75% | -7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.33% | 44.29% | -6.96% |
Dividends
ESAB vs. WSM - Dividend Comparison
ESAB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than WSM's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESAB ESAB Corp | 0.39% | 0.34% | 0.25% | 0.27% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WSM Williams-Sonoma, Inc. | 1.21% | 1.43% | 1.16% | 1.72% | 2.65% | 1.43% | 1.93% | 2.55% | 3.33% | 2.98% | 3.02% | 2.36% |
Financials
ESAB vs. WSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ESAB Corp and Williams-Sonoma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESAB vs. WSM - Profitability Comparison
ESAB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESAB Corp reported a gross profit of 275.11M and revenue of 745.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
WSM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.
ESAB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESAB Corp reported an operating income of 90.48M and revenue of 745.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.
WSM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
ESAB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ESAB Corp reported a net income of 47.64M and revenue of 745.60M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
WSM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESAB and WSM have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ESAB has higher volatility (16.15%) compared to WSM (11.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESAB dropped -41.08% vs WSM's -89.01%.
WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESAB and WSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer