PortfoliosLab logo
ES=F vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ES=F and GC=F is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ES=F vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and Gold (GC=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
273.57%
1,139.87%
ES=F
GC=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ES=F:

0.27

GC=F:

2.57

Sortino Ratio

ES=F:

0.52

GC=F:

3.26

Omega Ratio

ES=F:

1.08

GC=F:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

ES=F:

0.26

GC=F:

5.53

Martin Ratio

ES=F:

1.01

GC=F:

15.68

Ulcer Index

ES=F:

5.27%

GC=F:

2.82%

Daily Std Dev

ES=F:

19.03%

GC=F:

17.13%

Max Drawdown

ES=F:

-57.11%

GC=F:

-44.36%

Current Drawdown

ES=F:

-7.97%

GC=F:

-0.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES=F achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 29.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ES=F having a 9.61% annualized return and GC=F not far ahead at 9.76%.


ES=F

YTD

-4.45%

1M

15.43%

6M

-2.42%

1Y

8.94%

5Y*

12.98%

10Y*

9.61%

GC=F

YTD

29.16%

1M

12.75%

6M

23.93%

1Y

46.28%

5Y*

13.06%

10Y*

9.76%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ES=F vs. GC=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ES=F is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GC=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GC=F is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GC=F is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ES=F vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ES=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES=F and GC=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.18
2.82
ES=F
GC=F

Drawdowns

ES=F vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES=F drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES=F and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.97%
-0.30%
ES=F
GC=F

Volatility

ES=F vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) is 5.40%, while Gold (GC=F) has a volatility of 8.25%. This indicates that ES=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.40%
8.25%
ES=F
GC=F