PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ES=F vs. GC=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ES=FGC=F
YTD Return17.25%25.81%
1Y Return25.35%34.31%
3Y Return (Ann)7.18%12.39%
5Y Return (Ann)12.14%10.13%
10Y Return (Ann)10.03%6.93%
Sharpe Ratio2.172.37
Daily Std Dev11.89%14.19%
Max Drawdown-57.11%-44.36%
Current Drawdown-1.30%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.0

The correlation between ES=F and GC=F is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ES=F vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ES=F achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly lower than GC=F's 25.81% return. Over the past 10 years, ES=F has outperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 10.03%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively lower 6.93% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.65%
20.34%
ES=F
GC=F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ES=F vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ES=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ES=F, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.15
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ES=F, currently valued at 2.94, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.503.002.94
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ES=F, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.43
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ES=F, currently valued at 2.83, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.83
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ES=F, currently valued at 11.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0011.80
GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 3.04, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.04
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 5.59, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.005.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 12.26, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0012.26

ES=F vs. GC=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ES=F Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which roughly equals the GC=F Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of ES=F and GC=F.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
2.15
2.31
ES=F
GC=F

Drawdowns

ES=F vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES=F drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES=F and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-1.30%
0
ES=F
GC=F

Volatility

ES=F vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) is 3.79%, while Gold (GC=F) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that ES=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.79%
4.12%
ES=F
GC=F