ES=F vs. GC=F
Compare and contrast key facts about S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and Gold (GC=F).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ES=F or GC=F.
Key characteristics
| ES=F | GC=F | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 23.86% | 24.67% |
| 1Y Return | 31.91% | 31.18% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.42% | 10.06% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.49% | 10.51% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 10.50% | 7.12% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.97 | 2.10 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.75 | 2.72 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.38 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.71 | 3.76 |
| Martin Ratio | 11.14 | 11.44 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.12% | 2.60% |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.57% | 14.17% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.11% | -44.36% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.17% | -7.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between ES=F and GC=F is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
ES=F vs. GC=F - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ES=F having a 23.86% return and GC=F slightly higher at 24.67%. Over the past 10 years, ES=F has outperformed GC=F with an annualized return of 10.50%, while GC=F has yielded a comparatively lower 7.12% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ES=F vs. GC=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and Gold (GC=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Drawdowns
ES=F vs. GC=F - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ES=F drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, which is greater than GC=F's maximum drawdown of -44.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES=F and GC=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ES=F vs. GC=F - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) is 3.83%, while Gold (GC=F) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that ES=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GC=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.