PortfoliosLab logo
ES=F vs. CL=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ES=F and CL=F is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ES=F vs. CL=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
519.69%
206.85%
ES=F
CL=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ES=F:

0.27

CL=F:

-0.69

Sortino Ratio

ES=F:

0.52

CL=F:

-0.81

Omega Ratio

ES=F:

1.08

CL=F:

0.90

Calmar Ratio

ES=F:

0.26

CL=F:

-0.35

Martin Ratio

ES=F:

1.01

CL=F:

-1.34

Ulcer Index

ES=F:

5.27%

CL=F:

15.76%

Daily Std Dev

ES=F:

19.03%

CL=F:

29.97%

Max Drawdown

ES=F:

-57.11%

CL=F:

-93.11%

Current Drawdown

ES=F:

-7.97%

CL=F:

-58.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES=F achieves a -4.45% return, which is significantly higher than CL=F's -16.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ES=F has outperformed CL=F with an annualized return of 9.61%, while CL=F has yielded a comparatively lower 0.03% annualized return.


ES=F

YTD

-4.45%

1M

15.43%

6M

-2.42%

1Y

8.94%

5Y*

12.98%

10Y*

9.61%

CL=F

YTD

-16.36%

1M

-3.87%

6M

-17.22%

1Y

-24.07%

5Y*

17.80%

10Y*

0.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ES=F vs. CL=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ES=F is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CL=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CL=F is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CL=F is 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CL=F is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CL=F is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CL=F is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CL=F is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ES=F vs. CL=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and Crude Oil WTI (CL=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ES=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the CL=F Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES=F and CL=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.18
-0.86
ES=F
CL=F

Drawdowns

ES=F vs. CL=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES=F drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, smaller than the maximum CL=F drawdown of -93.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES=F and CL=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.97%
-58.99%
ES=F
CL=F

Volatility

ES=F vs. CL=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) is 5.40%, while Crude Oil WTI (CL=F) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that ES=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.40%
10.16%
ES=F
CL=F