PortfoliosLab logo
ES=F vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ES=F and ^GSPC is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

ES=F vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ES=F:

0.39

^GSPC:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

ES=F:

0.45

^GSPC:

0.79

Omega Ratio

ES=F:

1.07

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

ES=F:

0.22

^GSPC:

0.48

Martin Ratio

ES=F:

0.83

^GSPC:

1.85

Ulcer Index

ES=F:

5.35%

^GSPC:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

ES=F:

19.03%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

ES=F:

-57.11%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

ES=F:

-7.87%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ES=F achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ES=F has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 9.68%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.45% annualized return.


ES=F

YTD

-4.34%

1M

3.41%

6M

-5.76%

1Y

8.38%

5Y*

12.65%

10Y*

9.68%

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

3.72%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.55%

5Y*

14.11%

10Y*

10.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ES=F vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ES=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ES=F is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ES=F is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ES=F is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ES=F is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ES=F vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for S&P 500 E-Mini Futures (ES=F) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ES=F Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ES=F and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

ES=F vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ES=F drawdown since its inception was -57.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ES=F and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ES=F vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...