ERIE vs. QQQM
ERIE (Erie Indemnity Company) is a stock, while QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, ERIE returned 4.31%/yr vs 17.94%/yr for QQQM. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ERIE vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ERIE achieves a -22.58% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.73% return.
ERIE
- 1D
- 5.92%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- YTD
- -22.58%
- 6M
- -25.97%
- 1Y
- -37.80%
- 3Y*
- 2.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 10.73%
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 20.73%
- 6M
- 19.22%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 28.64%
- 5Y*
- 17.94%
- 10Y*
- —
ERIE vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERIE Erie Indemnity Company | -22.58% | -29.40% | 24.67% | 37.35% | 32.03% | -19.98% | 7.97% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 20.73% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between ERIE and QQQM is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.22 |
The correlation between ERIE and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ERIE vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
ERIE
QQQM
ERIE vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ERIE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.44 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | 3.43 | -4.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 13.15 | -14.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ERIE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.24 | 2.58 | -3.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.81 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.84 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
ERIE vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ERIE drawdown since its inception was -78.28%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ERIE and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ERIE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.28% | -35.04% | -43.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.16% | -11.96% | -31.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.87% | -22.70% | -38.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.87% | -35.04% | -25.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.55% | -0.75% | -57.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.55% | -8.24% | -25.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.27% | 3.11% | +20.16% |
Volatility
ERIE vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.51%. This indicates that ERIE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ERIE | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.51% | 4.51% | +5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.81% | 12.06% | +11.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 15.91% | +14.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 22.23% | +7.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.17% | 22.11% | +7.06% |
Dividends
ERIE vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
ERIE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than QQQM's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERIE Erie Indemnity Company | 2.58% | 1.90% | 1.24% | 1.42% | 1.79% | 2.15% | 2.39% | 2.17% | 2.52% | 2.57% | 1.95% | 3.61% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ERIE and QQQM have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERIE has higher volatility (9.51%) compared to QQQM (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ERIE dropped -78.28% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ERIE and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer