PortfoliosLab logo
EQWL vs. XLK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EQWL and XLK is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

EQWL vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
451.10%
992.13%
EQWL
XLK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EQWL:

0.64

XLK:

0.12

Sortino Ratio

EQWL:

0.99

XLK:

0.38

Omega Ratio

EQWL:

1.15

XLK:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

EQWL:

0.71

XLK:

0.14

Martin Ratio

EQWL:

3.17

XLK:

0.46

Ulcer Index

EQWL:

3.34%

XLK:

7.72%

Daily Std Dev

EQWL:

16.50%

XLK:

29.99%

Max Drawdown

EQWL:

-49.36%

XLK:

-82.05%

Current Drawdown

EQWL:

-8.96%

XLK:

-18.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQWL achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's -14.68% return. Over the past 10 years, EQWL has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 11.82%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 17.94% annualized return.


EQWL

YTD

-3.62%

1M

-6.23%

6M

-3.98%

1Y

8.69%

5Y*

15.94%

10Y*

11.82%

XLK

YTD

-14.68%

1M

-9.00%

6M

-13.01%

1Y

1.16%

5Y*

18.51%

10Y*

17.94%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQWL vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQWL has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Expense ratio chart for EQWL: current value is 0.25%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
EQWL: 0.25%
Expense ratio chart for XLK: current value is 0.13%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
XLK: 0.13%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EQWL vs. XLK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQWL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EQWL is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EQWL is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLK is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLK is 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLK is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLK is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLK is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLK is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EQWL vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for EQWL, currently valued at 0.64, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
EQWL: 0.64
XLK: 0.12
The chart of Sortino ratio for EQWL, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
EQWL: 0.99
XLK: 0.38
The chart of Omega ratio for EQWL, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
EQWL: 1.15
XLK: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for EQWL, currently valued at 0.71, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
EQWL: 0.71
XLK: 0.14
The chart of Martin ratio for EQWL, currently valued at 3.17, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
EQWL: 3.17
XLK: 0.46

The current EQWL Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQWL and XLK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.64
0.12
EQWL
XLK

Dividends

EQWL vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

EQWL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than XLK's 0.79% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EQWL
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
2.00%1.86%1.97%2.12%1.65%2.01%2.04%2.23%1.27%2.01%2.03%1.74%
XLK
Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.79%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%1.75%

Drawdowns

EQWL vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQWL drawdown since its inception was -49.36%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQWL and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-8.96%
-18.08%
EQWL
XLK

Volatility

EQWL vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF (EQWL) is 12.34%, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) has a volatility of 18.61%. This indicates that EQWL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
12.34%
18.61%
EQWL
XLK