EQL vs. NTSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and NTSX (WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while NTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by WisdomTree. EQL is passively managed, while NTSX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, EQL returned 10.49%/yr vs 9.69%/yr for NTSX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for NTSX.

Performance

EQL vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQL having a 8.83% return and NTSX slightly lower at 8.62%.

EQL

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.12%
• 1Y: 18.80%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

NTSX

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 7.83%
• 1Y: 25.27%
• 3Y*: 19.38%
• 5Y*: 9.69%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	8.83%	13.09%	16.44%	16.87%	-10.72%	29.32%	10.87%	27.87%	-9.86%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	8.62%	18.82%	20.20%	22.70%	-25.84%	22.21%	24.87%	32.03%	-8.72%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and NTSX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018	0.85

The correlation between EQL and NTSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EQL vs. NTSX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQL	NTSX
Technology	10.8%	35.1%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	10.1%
Real Estate	9.3%	1.5%
Communication Services	8.9%	12.5%
Utilities	8.9%	2.1%
Financial Services	8.9%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	5.5%
Industrials	8.7%	7.7%
Energy	8.6%	3.5%
Healthcare	8.6%	8.4%
Basic Materials	8.2%	1.4%

Return for Risk

EQL vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 60
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

NTSX

NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 60
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQL	NTSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.06	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.81	+0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	2.77	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.93	12.25	-0.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQL vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and NTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQL	NTSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.06	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.57	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.71	+0.14

Drawdowns

EQL vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and NTSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQL	NTSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.65%	-31.34%	-4.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-9.16%	+2.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.07%	-16.82%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.24%	-31.34%	+12.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-1.05%	+0.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-6.79%	+3.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	2.07%	-0.49%

Volatility

EQL vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 2.21%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQL	NTSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	3.39%	-1.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.82%	9.58%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.34%	12.31%	-2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	17.04%	-2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	18.27%	-1.73%

EQL vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EQL vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than NTSX's 1.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.62%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%
NTSX WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund	1.08%	1.14%	1.14%	1.21%	1.36%	0.82%	0.92%	1.42%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQL and NTSX in my portfolio?

EQL and NTSX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EQL or NTSX?

NTSX has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to EQL (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs NTSX's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, EQL or NTSX?

On 5-year performance, EQL leads with 10.49% vs 9.69% for NTSX. On fees, NTSX is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, EQL has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQL or NTSX?

Over the 5-year period, EQL has performed better with a 10.49% return vs 9.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQL or NTSX?

NTSX is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQL or NTSX?

EQL has the higher dividend yield at 1.62%, compared with 1.08% for NTSX.

What is the main difference between EQL and NTSX?

EQL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while NTSX is Diversified Portfolio. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.20% for NTSX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.