PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQL vs. NTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EQL vs. NTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EQL vs. NTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQL
Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF
3.18%13.09%16.44%16.87%-10.72%29.32%10.87%27.87%-9.86%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
-4.22%18.82%20.20%22.70%-25.84%22.21%24.87%32.03%-8.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQL achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than NTSX's -4.22% return.


EQL

1D
0.23%
1M
-4.16%
YTD
3.18%
6M
4.20%
1Y
15.32%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
12.17%

NTSX

1D
0.38%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
-4.22%
6M
-2.82%
1Y
16.25%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EQL vs. NTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EQL vs. NTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL
EQL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NTSX
NTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
NTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
NTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL vs. NTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EQLNTSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

0.89

+0.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.30

+0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.20

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.52

-0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.43

6.52

-0.09

EQL vs. NTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the NTSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and NTSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EQLNTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

0.89

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.48

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.62

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and NTSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EQL vs. NTSX - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than NTSX's 1.22% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQL
Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF
1.71%1.73%1.78%1.96%2.14%1.69%2.29%1.95%2.39%1.97%2.89%2.07%
NTSX
WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund
1.22%1.14%1.14%1.21%1.36%0.82%0.92%1.42%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EQL vs. NTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, which is greater than NTSX's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and NTSX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EQLNTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.65%

-31.34%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.90%

-11.13%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

-31.34%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-6.04%

+1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-6.92%

+3.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.60%

-0.18%

Volatility

EQL vs. NTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alps Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) is 3.88%, while WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) has a volatility of 6.11%. This indicates that EQL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EQLNTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

6.11%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.31%

9.65%

-2.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.87%

18.38%

-3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

17.04%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

18.38%

-1.83%