EQL vs. DGRO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQL (ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EQL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while DGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQL returned 12.47%/yr vs 13.30%/yr for DGRO. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQL charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for DGRO.

Performance

EQL vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EQL having a 8.83% return and DGRO slightly lower at 8.76%. Over the past 10 years, EQL has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 12.47%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.

EQL

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.96%
• YTD: 8.83%
• 6M: 9.12%
• 1Y: 18.80%
• 3Y*: 16.48%
• 5Y*: 10.49%
• 10Y*: 12.47%

DGRO

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 3.14%
• YTD: 8.76%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 22.54%
• 3Y*: 16.99%
• 5Y*: 10.54%
• 10Y*: 13.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQL vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	8.83%	13.09%	16.44%	16.87%	-10.72%	29.32%	10.87%	27.87%	-6.12%	18.37%
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	8.76%	15.69%	16.62%	10.47%	-7.91%	26.64%	9.50%	29.87%	-2.38%	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between EQL and DGRO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014	0.93

The correlation between EQL and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQL vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQL	DGRO
Technology	10.8%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	5.7%
Real Estate	9.3%	-
Communication Services	8.9%	0.1%
Utilities	8.9%	6.9%
Financial Services	8.9%	21.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	11.5%
Industrials	8.7%	10.8%
Energy	8.6%	5.6%
Healthcare	8.6%	16.4%
Basic Materials	8.2%	2.5%

Return for Risk

EQL vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQL

EQL Risk / Return Rank: 60
EQL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
EQL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EQL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EQL Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
EQL Martin Ratio Rank: 64

DGRO

DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 71
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 70
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQL vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQL	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.39	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	3.49	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	3.50	-0.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.93	13.52	-1.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQL vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQL Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQL and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQL	DGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.39	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	0.77	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.80	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.76	+0.09

Drawdowns

EQL vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQL drawdown since its inception was -35.65%, roughly equal to the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQL and DGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQL	DGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.65%	-35.10%	-0.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-6.47%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.07%	-14.03%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.24%	-19.31%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.65%	-35.10%	-0.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.00%	-0.28%	-0.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.26%	-3.44%	+0.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.58%	1.67%	-0.09%

Volatility

EQL vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF (EQL) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) have volatilities of 2.21% and 2.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQL	DGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.21%	2.21%	0.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.82%	6.91%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.34%	9.48%	-0.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.55%	13.82%	+0.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.54%	16.62%	-0.08%

EQL vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQL has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EQL vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

EQL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF	1.96%	2.09%	2.26%	2.45%	2.34%	1.93%	2.30%	2.21%	2.44%	2.03%	2.27%	2.52%
EQL ALPS Equal Sector Weight ETF	1.62%	1.73%	1.78%	1.96%	2.14%	1.69%	2.29%	1.95%	2.39%	1.97%	2.89%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQL and DGRO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, EQL and DGRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EQL or DGRO?

DGRO has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to EQL (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQL dropped -35.65% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

Which ETF is better, EQL or DGRO?

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 12.47% for EQL. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQL or DGRO?

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 12.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQL or DGRO?

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for EQL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQL or DGRO?

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.62% for EQL.

What is the main difference between EQL and DGRO?

EQL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. EQL tracks NYSE Equal Sector Weight Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for EQL and 0.08% for DGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.