EQAL vs. XYLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD).

EQAL and XYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EQAL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Dec 23, 2014. XYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2013. Both EQAL and XYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

EQAL vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EQAL vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	5.16%	11.05%	11.38%	11.98%	-13.49%	23.14%	16.57%	24.54%	-9.22%	17.36%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	-1.04%	8.02%	19.49%	11.10%	-12.05%	19.59%	-0.56%	21.41%	-6.09%	16.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 5.16% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's -1.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 10.35%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.87% annualized return.

EQAL

• 1D: 2.07%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: 5.16%
• 6M: 6.95%
• 1Y: 18.78%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: 10.35%

XYLD

• 1D: 2.01%
• 1M: -2.96%
• YTD: -1.04%
• 6M: 5.33%
• 1Y: 10.53%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: 6.95%
• 10Y*: 7.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAL vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

XYLD

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF

EQAL

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF

Return for Risk

EQAL vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAL

EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 63
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 63
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 68

XYLD

XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 56
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 71
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAL vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQAL	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.76	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.22	+0.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.41	1.10	+0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.61	6.46	+0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQAL vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQAL	XYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	0.76	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.62	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	0.55	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.57	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and XYLD is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EQAL vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than XYLD's 10.98% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	1.75%	1.79%	1.62%	1.88%	1.95%	1.32%	1.63%	1.61%	1.62%	1.18%	1.57%	1.64%
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF	10.98%	10.51%	11.54%	10.51%	13.43%	9.07%	7.93%	5.76%	7.12%	5.18%	3.23%	4.65%

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and XYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQAL	XYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.44%	-33.46%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.61%	-10.14%	-3.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.79%	-18.66%	-3.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	-33.46%	-6.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.30%	-3.39%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-3.76%	-1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	1.72%	+1.17%

Volatility

EQAL vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 4.01%. This indicates that EQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQAL	XYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	4.01%	+0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	5.82%	+3.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.05%	13.99%	+4.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	11.31%	+5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.90%	14.23%	+4.67%