PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPOL vs. CATH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPOL vs. CATH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly higher than CATH's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has underperformed CATH with an annualized return of 11.51%, while CATH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.


EPOL

1D
0.32%
1M
4.83%
YTD
14.18%
6M
23.43%
1Y
38.60%
3Y*
35.91%
5Y*
16.15%
10Y*
11.51%

CATH

1D
0.11%
1M
4.54%
YTD
10.13%
6M
10.25%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
21.15%
5Y*
12.77%
10Y*
14.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPOL vs. CATH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
14.18%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
10.13%17.08%23.34%26.15%-19.96%28.87%18.80%30.64%-5.80%22.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and CATH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016

0.52

The correlation between EPOL and CATH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPOL vs. CATH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPOL
CATH

Financial Services

45.6%
11.4%

Energy

14.6%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
9.9%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.7%

Communication Services

6.3%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.6%

Utilities

5.1%
2.8%

Technology

1.9%
38.1%

Industrials

1.7%
7.6%

Healthcare

0.3%
7.9%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

EPOL
45.6%
CATH
11.4%

Energy

EPOL
14.6%
CATH
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EPOL
12.4%
CATH
9.9%

Basic Materials

EPOL
6.6%
CATH
1.7%

Communication Services

EPOL
6.3%
CATH
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

EPOL
5.5%
CATH
4.6%

Utilities

EPOL
5.1%
CATH
2.8%

Technology

EPOL
1.9%
CATH
38.1%

Industrials

EPOL
1.7%
CATH
7.6%

Healthcare

EPOL
0.3%
CATH
7.9%

Real Estate

EPOL

-

CATH
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPOL vs. CATH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

CATH
CATH Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPOL vs. CATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPOLCATHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.67

2.16

-0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.38

2.94

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

2.84

+0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.69

12.75

-3.06

EPOL vs. CATH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is comparable to the CATH Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and CATH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPOLCATHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.67

2.16

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.72

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.80

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.80

-0.58

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. CATH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than CATH's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and CATH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPOLCATHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-33.95%

-29.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-9.42%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-19.34%

-2.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-28.14%

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-33.95%

-27.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.13%

0.00%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.90%

-5.20%

-21.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

2.10%

+1.94%

Volatility

EPOL vs. CATH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) at 2.60%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPOLCATHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

2.60%

+5.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

9.10%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.19%

12.12%

+11.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.07%

17.89%

+11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.66%

18.61%

+9.05%

EPOL vs. CATH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CATH's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPOL vs. CATH - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than CATH's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
0.76%0.84%0.95%1.16%1.34%1.03%1.23%0.68%2.01%1.27%0.50%0.00%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
4.19%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPOL and CATH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to CATH (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs CATH's -33.95%.

On 10-year performance, CATH leads with 14.90% vs 11.51% for EPOL. On fees, CATH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CATH has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CATH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.76% for CATH.

EPOL is categorized as Europe Equities, while CATH is S&P 500. EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.29% for CATH.

CATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPOL and CATH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer