PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPOL vs. CATH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPOL vs. CATH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 22.62% return, which is significantly higher than CATH's 8.38% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has underperformed CATH with an annualized return of 11.96%, while CATH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.43% annualized return.


EPOL

1D
0.16%
1M
8.60%
6M
14.79%
YTD
22.62%
1Y
40.70%
3Y*
33.53%
5Y*
18.62%
10Y*
11.96%
ALL TIME*
6.44%

CATH

1D
0.68%
1M
0.43%
6M
7.15%
YTD
8.38%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
11.39%
10Y*
14.43%
ALL TIME*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.68M$3.59M$4.06M
$18.30M$16.66M$16.43M

EPOL vs. CATH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
22.62%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
8.38%17.08%23.34%26.15%-19.96%28.87%18.80%30.64%-5.80%22.83%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and CATH is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2016

0.52

The correlation between EPOL and CATH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPOL vs. CATH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPOL
CATH

Financial Services

45.7%
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
8.8%

Energy

13.2%
3.4%

Basic Materials

7.1%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
4.6%

Communication Services

5.4%
9.4%

Utilities

4.5%
2.8%

Industrials

1.8%
7.6%

Technology

1.7%
38.2%

Healthcare

0.7%
8.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

EPOL
45.7%
CATH
12.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EPOL
14.0%
CATH
8.8%

Energy

EPOL
13.2%
CATH
3.4%

Basic Materials

EPOL
7.1%
CATH
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

EPOL
6.0%
CATH
4.6%

Communication Services

EPOL
5.4%
CATH
9.4%

Utilities

EPOL
4.5%
CATH
2.8%

Industrials

EPOL
1.8%
CATH
7.6%

Technology

EPOL
1.7%
CATH
38.2%

Healthcare

EPOL
0.7%
CATH
8.8%

Real Estate

EPOL

-

CATH
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPOL vs. CATH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CATH
CATH Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EPOL vs. CATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPOLCATHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.23

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

1.74

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.96

7.18

+2.78

EPOL vs. CATH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the CATH Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and CATH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. CATH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than CATH's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and CATH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPOLCATHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-33.95%

-29.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-9.42%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-19.34%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-28.14%

-26.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-33.95%

-27.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.59%

+1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.64%

-5.15%

-21.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

2.28%

+1.79%

Volatility

EPOL vs. CATH - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) at 3.58%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPOLCATHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

3.58%

+1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.34%

10.09%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.12%

13.02%

+10.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.12%

17.98%

+11.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.42%

18.61%

+8.81%

EPOL vs. CATH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CATH's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPOL vs. CATH - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than CATH's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CATH
Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF
0.77%0.84%0.95%1.16%1.34%1.03%1.23%0.68%2.01%1.27%0.50%0.00%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
3.44%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPOL and CATH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to CATH (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs CATH's -33.95%.

On 10-year performance, CATH leads with 14.43% vs 11.96% for EPOL. On fees, CATH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CATH has performed better with a 14.43% return vs 11.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CATH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.77% for CATH.

EPOL is categorized as Europe Equities, while CATH is S&P 500. EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.29% for CATH.

EPOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPOL and CATH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer