EPOL vs. CATH
EPOL (iShares MSCI Poland ETF) and CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPOL is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while CATH is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPOL returned 11.51%/yr vs 14.90%/yr for CATH. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPOL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CATH.
Performance
EPOL vs. CATH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 14.18% return, which is significantly higher than CATH's 10.13% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has underperformed CATH with an annualized return of 11.51%, while CATH has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.
EPOL
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 14.18%
- 6M
- 23.43%
- 1Y
- 38.60%
- 3Y*
- 35.91%
- 5Y*
- 16.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.51%
CATH
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 10.25%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
EPOL vs. CATH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF | 14.18% | 77.34% | -2.61% | 50.70% | -24.62% | 12.21% | -8.38% | -6.13% | -13.76% | 52.43% |
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 10.13% | 17.08% | 23.34% | 26.15% | -19.96% | 28.87% | 18.80% | 30.64% | -5.80% | 22.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPOL and CATH is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EPOL and CATH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPOL vs. CATH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPOL
CATH
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
EPOL
CATH
Energy
EPOL
CATH
Consumer Cyclical
EPOL
CATH
Basic Materials
EPOL
CATH
Communication Services
EPOL
CATH
Consumer Defensive
EPOL
CATH
Utilities
EPOL
CATH
Technology
EPOL
CATH
Industrials
EPOL
CATH
Healthcare
EPOL
CATH
Real Estate
EPOL
-
CATH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPOL vs. CATH — Risk / Return Rank
EPOL
CATH
EPOL vs. CATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPOL | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 2.16 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 2.94 | -0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.84 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 12.75 | -3.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPOL | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 2.16 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.72 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.80 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.80 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
EPOL vs. CATH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than CATH's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and CATH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPOL | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.72% | -33.95% | -29.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | -9.42% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.81% | -19.34% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.21% | -28.14% | -26.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.41% | -33.95% | -27.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | 0.00% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.90% | -5.20% | -21.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.10% | +1.94% |
Volatility
EPOL vs. CATH - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 7.88% compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) at 2.60%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPOL | CATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.88% | 2.60% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.35% | 9.10% | +8.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.19% | 12.12% | +11.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.07% | 17.89% | +11.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.66% | 18.61% | +9.05% |
EPOL vs. CATH - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than CATH's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPOL vs. CATH - Dividend Comparison
EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than CATH's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF | 0.76% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.34% | 1.03% | 1.23% | 0.68% | 2.01% | 1.27% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF | 4.19% | 4.78% | 6.04% | 2.87% | 2.65% | 1.33% | 1.44% | 2.51% | 1.44% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPOL and CATH have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPOL has higher volatility (7.88%) compared to CATH (2.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs CATH's -33.95%.
On 10-year performance, CATH leads with 14.90% vs 11.51% for EPOL. On fees, CATH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 2.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CATH has performed better with a 14.90% return vs 11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CATH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.
EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 0.76% for CATH.
EPOL is categorized as Europe Equities, while CATH is S&P 500. EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.29% for CATH.
CATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPOL and CATH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer