EPGFX vs. SPUS
Compare and contrast key facts about EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS).
EPGFX is managed by Euro Pacific Asset Management. It was launched on Jul 18, 2013. SPUS is a passively managed fund by Toroso Investments that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2019.
Performance
EPGFX vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EPGFX vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | -1.16% | 129.06% | 8.51% | 2.31% | -14.00% | -18.06% | 36.99% | 7.58% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | -5.55% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPGFX achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than SPUS's -5.55% return.
EPGFX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -24.63%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 10.68%
- 1Y
- 80.88%
- 3Y*
- 30.08%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.07%
SPUS
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -5.39%
- YTD
- -5.55%
- 6M
- -2.24%
- 1Y
- 24.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EPGFX vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPGFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EPGFX vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
EPGFX
SPUS
EPGFX vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPGFX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 1.18 | +0.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 1.80 | +0.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.26 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 1.96 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 8.40 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPGFX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.18 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.72 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.75 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between EPGFX and SPUS is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
EPGFX vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
EPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than SPUS's 0.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund | 6.94% | 6.86% | 10.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.49% | 8.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.56% | 19.31% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.63% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
EPGFX vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and SPUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPGFX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.70% | -30.80% | -25.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.88% | -12.76% | -16.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -28.06% | -19.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.63% | -7.77% | -16.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -6.35% | -15.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.25% | 2.98% | +4.27% |
Volatility
EPGFX vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) has a higher volatility of 14.63% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 6.04%. This indicates that EPGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EPGFX | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.63% | 6.04% | +8.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.74% | 11.25% | +20.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.55% | 20.90% | +17.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.01% | 19.20% | +12.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.58% | 21.43% | +11.15% |