PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPC vs. COCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EPC vs. COCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPC achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than COCO's 41.82% return.


EPC

1D
-0.70%
1M
-14.05%
YTD
9.46%
6M
7.01%
1Y
-28.17%
3Y*
-22.15%
5Y*
-14.87%
10Y*
-12.94%

COCO

1D
0.98%
1M
11.79%
YTD
41.82%
6M
37.64%
1Y
114.80%
3Y*
41.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPC vs. COCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care Company
9.46%-47.95%-6.83%-3.48%-14.34%31.04%
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
41.82%43.62%43.90%85.60%23.72%-17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EPC and COCO is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2021

0.09

The correlation between EPC and COCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EPC:

$861.65M

COCO:

$4.55B

EPS

EPC:

-$1.66

COCO:

$1.38

PS Ratio

EPC:

0.41

COCO:

6.86

PB Ratio

EPC:

0.60

COCO:

12.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

EPC:

$2.11B

COCO:

$658.62M

Gross Profit (TTM)

EPC:

$855.00M

COCO:

$246.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

EPC:

$57.10M

COCO:

$100.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPC vs. COCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPC
EPC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
EPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPC Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPC Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

COCO
COCO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
COCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
COCO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
COCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
COCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPC vs. COCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC) and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPCCOCODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.67

2.22

-2.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.73

3.01

-3.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.39

-0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.70

4.97

-5.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.17

13.95

-15.13

EPC vs. COCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPC Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the COCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPC and COCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPCCOCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.67

2.22

-2.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.02

0.80

-0.78

Drawdowns

EPC vs. COCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, which is greater than COCO's maximum drawdown of -56.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPC and COCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPCCOCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.74%

-56.97%

-26.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.41%

-23.23%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.60%

-38.55%

-23.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.93%

-5.11%

-75.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.78%

-16.79%

-18.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.05%

8.27%

+15.78%

Volatility

EPC vs. COCO - Volatility Comparison

Edgewell Personal Care Company (EPC) has a higher volatility of 18.07% compared to The Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) at 9.95%. This indicates that EPC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPCCOCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.07%

9.95%

+8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.40%

41.33%

-10.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.45%

52.08%

-9.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.67%

56.61%

-23.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.82%

56.61%

-19.79%

Dividends

EPC vs. COCO - Dividend Comparison

EPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, while COCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care Company
3.24%3.52%1.79%1.64%1.56%1.31%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%44.66%

Financials

EPC vs. COCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Edgewell Personal Care Company and The Vita Coco Company, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
519.50M
179.77M
(EPC) Total Revenue
(COCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EPC vs. COCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Edgewell Personal Care Company and The Vita Coco Company, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
41.8%
40.0%
Portfolio components
EPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edgewell Personal Care Company reported a gross profit of 216.90M and revenue of 519.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.

COCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 71.81M and revenue of 179.77M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

EPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edgewell Personal Care Company reported an operating income of 18.40M and revenue of 519.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.

COCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.7%.

EPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Edgewell Personal Care Company reported a net income of -10.60M and revenue of 519.50M, resulting in a net margin of -2.0%.

COCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Vita Coco Company, Inc. reported a net income of 30.47M and revenue of 179.77M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EPC and COCO have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPC has higher volatility (18.07%) compared to COCO (9.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPC dropped -83.74% vs COCO's -56.97%.

COCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPC and COCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer