EPAM vs. WIT
EPAM (EPAM Systems, Inc.) and WIT (Wipro Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Information Technology Services industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, EPAM returned 4.17%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for WIT. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
EPAM vs. WIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -48.48% return, which is significantly lower than WIT's -27.67% return. Over the past 10 years, EPAM has outperformed WIT with an annualized return of 4.17%, while WIT has yielded a comparatively lower 0.28% annualized return.
EPAM
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- 19.59%
- 6M
- -49.40%
- YTD
- -48.48%
- 1Y
- -30.09%
- 3Y*
- -23.90%
- 5Y*
- -28.37%
- 10Y*
- 4.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.12%
WIT
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- 5.94%
- 6M
- -20.55%
- YTD
- -27.67%
- 1Y
- -23.36%
- 3Y*
- -4.61%
- 5Y*
- -12.26%
- 10Y*
- 0.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $148.55M | $147.16M | $188.93M | |
| $17.00M | $19.37M | $25.49M |
EPAM vs. WIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | -48.48% | -12.38% | -21.36% | -9.28% | -50.97% | 86.54% | 68.91% | 82.88% | 7.99% | 67.05% |
WIT Wipro Limited | -27.67% | -16.61% | 27.38% | 19.82% | -51.78% | 73.10% | 51.23% | -2.31% | -5.94% | 13.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPAM and WIT is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2012 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
EPAM:
$5.51B
WIT:
$19.59B
EPAM:
$7.02
WIT:
₹12.62
EPAM:
15.04
WIT:
15.01
EPAM:
1.05
WIT:
2.09
EPAM:
1.67
WIT:
2.63
EPAM:
$5.56B
WIT:
₹951.13B
EPAM:
$1.58B
WIT:
₹276.25B
EPAM:
$670.13M
WIT:
₹206.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPAM vs. WIT — Risk / Return Rank
EPAM
WIT
EPAM vs. WIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Wipro Limited (WIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPAM | WIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.92 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.51 | -0.61 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | -1.16 | +0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPAM vs. WIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -89.40%, which is greater than WIT's maximum drawdown of -74.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and WIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPAM | WIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.40% | -74.86% | -14.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.65% | -40.32% | -25.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.83% | -49.94% | -25.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.40% | -61.29% | -28.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.40% | -61.29% | -28.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.29% | -56.46% | -28.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.33% | -31.03% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.75% | 21.11% | +13.64% |
Volatility
EPAM vs. WIT - Volatility Comparison
EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) has a higher volatility of 14.54% compared to Wipro Limited (WIT) at 8.84%. This indicates that EPAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPAM | WIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.54% | 8.84% | +5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.53% | 39.82% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.02% | 43.86% | +5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.19% | 32.60% | +22.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.08% | 29.87% | +16.21% |
Dividends
EPAM vs. WIT - Dividend Comparison
EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPAM EPAM Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WIT Wipro Limited | 4.37% | 4.43% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 1.69% | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.28% | 0.31% | 0.27% | 0.91% | 1.65% |
Financials
EPAM vs. WIT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Wipro Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EPAM vs. WIT - Profitability Comparison
EPAM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 388.01M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.7%.
WIT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wipro Limited reported a gross profit of 70.30B and revenue of 246.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.6%.
EPAM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 116.77M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.
WIT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wipro Limited reported an operating income of 38.52B and revenue of 246.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
EPAM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 82.52M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.
WIT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Wipro Limited reported a net income of 33.72B and revenue of 246.24B, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EPAM and WIT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPAM has higher volatility (14.54%) compared to WIT (8.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPAM dropped -89.40% vs WIT's -74.86%.
WIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPAM and WIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer