PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPAM vs. UBER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EPAM vs. UBER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -49.61% return, which is significantly lower than UBER's -12.35% return.


EPAM

1D
-5.08%
1M
-8.10%
YTD
-49.61%
6M
-46.51%
1Y
-39.48%
3Y*
-26.47%
5Y*
-26.31%
10Y*
3.17%

UBER

1D
-2.91%
1M
-4.66%
YTD
-12.35%
6M
-18.21%
1Y
-14.37%
3Y*
21.70%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPAM vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
-49.61%-12.38%-21.36%-9.28%-50.97%86.54%68.91%23.97%
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-12.35%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-28.46%

Correlation

The correlation between EPAM and UBER is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.34

The correlation between EPAM and UBER shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EPAM:

$5.59B

UBER:

$148.35B

EPS

EPAM:

$6.96

UBER:

$4.05

PE Ratio

EPAM:

14.83

UBER:

17.67

PS Ratio

EPAM:

1.03

UBER:

2.81

PB Ratio

EPAM:

1.63

UBER:

5.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

EPAM:

$5.56B

UBER:

$53.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EPAM:

$1.58B

UBER:

$22.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

EPAM:

$670.13M

UBER:

$5.85B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPAM vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPAM
EPAM Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
EPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPAM vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPAMUBERDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.89

-0.44

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.13

-0.45

-0.68

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

0.95

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

-0.48

-0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.59

-0.87

-0.72

EPAM vs. UBER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the UBER Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPAM and UBER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPAMUBERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.89

-0.44

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.49

0.18

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.16

+0.18

Drawdowns

EPAM vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -87.50%, which is greater than UBER's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and UBER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPAMUBERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.50%

-68.05%

-19.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.49%

-30.89%

-28.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.49%

-30.89%

-40.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.50%

-60.45%

-27.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.61%

-28.45%

-57.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.64%

-25.66%

+0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.71%

17.13%

+8.58%

Volatility

EPAM vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) has a higher volatility of 15.76% compared to Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) at 11.98%. This indicates that EPAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UBER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPAMUBERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.76%

11.98%

+3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.68%

24.24%

+13.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.36%

32.60%

+11.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.25%

44.88%

+9.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.78%

50.72%

-4.94%

Dividends

EPAM vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison

Neither EPAM nor UBER has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

EPAM vs. UBER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.40B
13.20B
(EPAM) Total Revenue
(UBER) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EPAM vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
27.7%
45.0%
Portfolio components
EPAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 388.01M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.7%.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

EPAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 116.77M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

EPAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 82.52M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EPAM and UBER have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPAM has higher volatility (15.76%) compared to UBER (11.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPAM dropped -87.50% vs UBER's -68.05%.

UBER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.44 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPAM and UBER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer