EPAM vs. TSLA

In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -17.51% return, which is significantly lower than TSLA's 41.89% return. Over the past 10 years, EPAM has underperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 17.17%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively higher 35.87% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current EPAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPAM and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither EPAM nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -76.27%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLA drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and TSLA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) is 17.02%, while Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) has a volatility of 22.24%. This indicates that EPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.