PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EPAM vs. MSFT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


EPAMMSFT
YTD Return-20.88%3.73%
1Y Return-15.68%28.46%
3Y Return (Ann)-19.95%16.63%
5Y Return (Ann)6.10%26.58%
10Y Return (Ann)21.86%27.82%
Sharpe Ratio-0.411.32
Daily Std Dev40.61%20.98%
Max Drawdown-75.64%-69.41%
Current Drawdown-67.21%-9.33%

Fundamentals


EPAMMSFT
Market Cap$13.77B$3.02T
EPS$7.06$11.54
PE Ratio33.6835.21
PEG Ratio1.332.02
Revenue (TTM)$4.69B$236.58B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.56B$135.62B
EBITDA (TTM)$675.45M$126.13B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between EPAM and MSFT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

EPAM vs. MSFT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -20.88% return, which is significantly lower than MSFT's 3.73% return. Over the past 10 years, EPAM has underperformed MSFT with an annualized return of 21.86%, while MSFT has yielded a comparatively higher 27.82% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


1,200.00%1,400.00%1,600.00%1,800.00%2,000.00%2,200.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1,580.43%
1,500.26%
EPAM
MSFT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EPAM Systems, Inc.

Microsoft Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EPAM vs. MSFT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPAM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EPAM, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.29
MSFT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.87
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 1.23, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.23
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.14
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for MSFT, currently valued at 5.29, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.005.29

EPAM vs. MSFT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the MSFT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of EPAM and MSFT.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.41
1.32
EPAM
MSFT

Dividends

EPAM vs. MSFT - Dividend Comparison

EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSFT
Microsoft Corporation
0.73%0.74%1.06%0.68%0.94%1.20%1.69%1.86%2.37%2.33%2.48%2.59%

Drawdowns

EPAM vs. MSFT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -75.64%, which is greater than MSFT's maximum drawdown of -69.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and MSFT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-67.21%
-9.33%
EPAM
MSFT

Volatility

EPAM vs. MSFT - Volatility Comparison

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
6.28%
6.33%
EPAM
MSFT

Financials

EPAM vs. MSFT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items