PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPAM vs. GOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EPAM vs. GOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -52.52% return, which is significantly lower than GOOG's 13.43% return. Over the past 10 years, EPAM has underperformed GOOG with an annualized return of 2.56%, while GOOG has yielded a comparatively higher 25.80% annualized return.


EPAM

1D
-5.76%
1M
-12.04%
YTD
-52.52%
6M
-51.36%
1Y
-44.15%
3Y*
-27.91%
5Y*
-27.40%
10Y*
2.56%

GOOG

1D
-0.76%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
13.43%
6M
11.09%
1Y
112.81%
3Y*
42.00%
5Y*
23.95%
10Y*
25.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPAM vs. GOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
-52.52%-12.38%-21.36%-9.28%-50.97%86.54%68.91%82.88%7.99%67.05%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
13.43%65.42%35.62%58.83%-38.67%65.17%31.03%29.10%-1.03%35.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EPAM and GOOG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2014

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between EPAM and GOOG has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EPAM:

$5.27B

GOOG:

$4.35T

EPS

EPAM:

$6.96

GOOG:

$13.11

PE Ratio

EPAM:

13.98

GOOG:

27.12

PS Ratio

EPAM:

0.97

GOOG:

10.28

PB Ratio

EPAM:

1.54

GOOG:

9.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

EPAM:

$5.56B

GOOG:

$422.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EPAM:

$1.58B

GOOG:

$255.12B

EBITDA (TTM)

EPAM:

$670.13M

GOOG:

$174.08B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPAM vs. GOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPAM
EPAM Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
EPAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPAM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
EPAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPAM Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOG
GOOG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPAM vs. GOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Alphabet Inc (GOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPAMGOOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.64

-0.82

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

5.47

-6.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.70

19.89

-21.60

EPAM vs. GOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the GOOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPAM and GOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPAMGOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

3.98

-4.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.51

0.77

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

0.89

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.82

-0.49

Drawdowns

EPAM vs. GOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -87.50%, which is greater than GOOG's maximum drawdown of -44.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and GOOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPAMGOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.50%

-44.60%

-42.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-59.49%

-20.75%

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.49%

-29.35%

-42.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.50%

-44.60%

-42.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.50%

-44.60%

-42.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-86.44%

-10.87%

-75.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.66%

-8.89%

-16.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.95%

5.69%

+20.26%

Volatility

EPAM vs. GOOG - Volatility Comparison

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) has a higher volatility of 16.68% compared to Alphabet Inc (GOOG) at 8.08%. This indicates that EPAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPAMGOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.68%

8.08%

+8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.00%

20.16%

+17.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.66%

28.59%

+16.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.31%

31.10%

+23.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.80%

28.99%

+16.81%

Dividends

EPAM vs. GOOG - Dividend Comparison

EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%.


PositionTTM20252024
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
GOOG
Alphabet Inc
0.24%0.26%0.32%

Financials

EPAM vs. GOOG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Alphabet Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
1.40B
109.90B
(EPAM) Total Revenue
(GOOG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EPAM vs. GOOG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Alphabet Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
27.7%
62.5%
Portfolio components
EPAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 388.01M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.7%.

GOOG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a gross profit of 68.63B and revenue of 109.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

EPAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 116.77M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

GOOG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported an operating income of 39.70B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 36.1%.

EPAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 82.52M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 5.9%.

GOOG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alphabet Inc reported a net income of 62.58B and revenue of 109.90B, resulting in a net margin of 56.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EPAM and GOOG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPAM has higher volatility (16.68%) compared to GOOG (8.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPAM dropped -87.50% vs GOOG's -44.60%.

GOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.98 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPAM and GOOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer