PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EPAM vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

EPAM vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
229.93%
0
EPAM
BTU

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -17.51% return, which is significantly lower than BTU's 14.14% return.


EPAM

YTD

-17.51%

1M

28.43%

6M

36.18%

1Y

-3.99%

5Y (annualized)

2.89%

10Y (annualized)

17.17%

BTU

YTD

14.14%

1M

12.46%

6M

17.21%

1Y

15.81%

5Y (annualized)

23.41%

10Y (annualized)

N/A

Fundamentals


EPAMBTU
Market Cap$13.30B$3.42B
EPS$7.69$3.79
PE Ratio30.497.42
PEG Ratio1.730.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$4.64B$4.27B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.36B$566.90M
EBITDA (TTM)$657.56M$1.12B

Key characteristics


EPAMBTU
Sharpe Ratio-0.090.50
Sortino Ratio0.191.00
Omega Ratio1.031.12
Calmar Ratio-0.050.34
Martin Ratio-0.131.47
Ulcer Index28.67%12.05%
Daily Std Dev43.94%35.29%
Max Drawdown-76.27%-98.07%
Current Drawdown-65.82%-35.04%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between EPAM and BTU is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EPAM vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.090.50
The chart of Sortino ratio for EPAM, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.191.00
The chart of Omega ratio for EPAM, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.031.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.050.34
The chart of Martin ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.131.47
EPAM
BTU

The current EPAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.09, which is lower than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPAM and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.09
0.50
EPAM
BTU

Dividends

EPAM vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%.


TTM202320222021202020192018
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
1.09%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%

Drawdowns

EPAM vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -76.27%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-65.82%
-35.04%
EPAM
BTU

Volatility

EPAM vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) has a higher volatility of 17.02% compared to Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) at 15.40%. This indicates that EPAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
17.02%
15.40%
EPAM
BTU

Financials

EPAM vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items