PortfoliosLab logo
EPAM vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between EPAM and BTU is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

EPAM vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EPAM:

-0.07

BTU:

-0.66

Sortino Ratio

EPAM:

0.24

BTU:

-0.75

Omega Ratio

EPAM:

1.03

BTU:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

EPAM:

-0.02

BTU:

-0.44

Martin Ratio

EPAM:

-0.10

BTU:

-1.03

Ulcer Index

EPAM:

18.52%

BTU:

32.34%

Daily Std Dev

EPAM:

42.17%

BTU:

51.63%

Max Drawdown

EPAM:

-80.02%

BTU:

-98.07%

Current Drawdown

EPAM:

-74.41%

BTU:

-64.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

EPAM:

$10.40B

BTU:

$1.79B

EPS

EPAM:

$7.14

BTU:

$2.70

PE Ratio

EPAM:

25.71

BTU:

5.45

PEG Ratio

EPAM:

2.11

BTU:

0.00

PS Ratio

EPAM:

2.14

BTU:

0.43

PB Ratio

EPAM:

2.86

BTU:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

EPAM:

$4.86B

BTU:

$4.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EPAM:

$1.45B

BTU:

$715.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

EPAM:

$675.00M

BTU:

$902.70M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -21.48% return, which is significantly higher than BTU's -29.06% return.


EPAM

YTD

-21.48%

1M

24.76%

6M

-21.97%

1Y

-2.24%

5Y*

-3.45%

10Y*

10.49%

BTU

YTD

-29.06%

1M

15.15%

6M

-44.44%

1Y

-33.65%

5Y*

37.16%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EPAM vs. BTU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EPAM is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EPAM is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

BTU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BTU is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BTU is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BTU is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BTU is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BTU is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BTU is 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EPAM vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EPAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPAM and BTU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

EPAM vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
2.04%1.43%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.43%1.59%

Drawdowns

EPAM vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -80.02%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

EPAM vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) is 14.15%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 16.50%. This indicates that EPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

EPAM vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20212022202320242025
1.30B
937.00M
(EPAM) Total Revenue
(BTU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EPAM vs. BTU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
26.9%
17.8%
(EPAM) Gross Margin
(BTU) Gross Margin
EPAM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 349.68M and revenue of 1.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.9%.

BTU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 166.80M and revenue of 937.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

EPAM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 99.33M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.6%.

BTU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 31.90M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

EPAM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EPAM Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 73.48M and revenue of 1.30B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.

BTU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Peabody Energy Corporation reported a net income of 38.30M and revenue of 937.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.