PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
EPAM vs. BTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


EPAMBTU
YTD Return-20.88%-9.50%
1Y Return-15.68%-5.93%
3Y Return (Ann)-19.95%82.08%
5Y Return (Ann)6.10%-3.82%
Sharpe Ratio-0.41-0.22
Daily Std Dev40.61%33.40%
Max Drawdown-75.64%-98.08%
Current Drawdown-67.21%-48.53%

Fundamentals


EPAMBTU
Market Cap$13.77B$3.01B
EPS$7.06$5.00
PE Ratio33.684.73
PEG Ratio1.330.00
Revenue (TTM)$4.69B$4.95B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.56B$1.69B
EBITDA (TTM)$675.45M$1.42B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between EPAM and BTU is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

EPAM vs. BTU - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, EPAM achieves a -20.88% return, which is significantly lower than BTU's -9.50% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
216.46%
-20.79%
EPAM
BTU

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EPAM Systems, Inc.

Peabody Energy Corporation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

EPAM vs. BTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) and Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPAM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.41, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.41
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.30
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EPAM, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EPAM, currently valued at -1.29, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-1.29
BTU
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.22, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00-0.22
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BTU, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.99
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BTU, currently valued at -0.81, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.81

EPAM vs. BTU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPAM Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the BTU Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of EPAM and BTU.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.000.20NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.41
-0.22
EPAM
BTU

Dividends

EPAM vs. BTU - Dividend Comparison

EPAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.


TTM202320222021202020192018
EPAM
EPAM Systems, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
1.37%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%26.34%1.50%

Drawdowns

EPAM vs. BTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPAM drawdown since its inception was -75.64%, smaller than the maximum BTU drawdown of -98.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAM and BTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%-55.00%-50.00%-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-67.21%
-48.53%
EPAM
BTU

Volatility

EPAM vs. BTU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EPAM Systems, Inc. (EPAM) is 6.28%, while Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that EPAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
6.28%
9.89%
EPAM
BTU

Financials

EPAM vs. BTU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between EPAM Systems, Inc. and Peabody Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items