EOS-USD vs. QYLD
EOS-USD (EOS) is a cryptocurrency, while QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Over the past 5 years, EOS-USD returned -55.96%/yr vs 8.26%/yr for QYLD. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EOS-USD achieves a -58.97% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.89% return.
EOS-USD
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -17.35%
- YTD
- -58.97%
- 6M
- -60.53%
- 1Y
- -87.32%
- 3Y*
- -55.26%
- 5Y*
- -55.96%
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.59%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 8.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EOS-USD EOS | -58.97% | -79.52% | -8.35% | -1.89% | -71.60% | 16.76% | 0.93% | 0.16% | -70.72% | 2,091.49% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.89% | 9.28% | 19.35% | 22.77% | -19.08% | 10.41% | 8.72% | 22.69% | -3.07% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between EOS-USD and QYLD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EOS-USD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
EOS-USD
QYLD
EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EOS (EOS-USD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EOS-USD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 1.52 | -0.83 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 4.56 | -5.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.33 | 25.38 | -26.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EOS-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.71%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOS-USD and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EOS-USD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.71% | -24.75% | -74.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.90% | -4.97% | -84.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.40% | -19.06% | -76.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.00% | -24.61% | -74.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.70% | -2.10% | -97.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.94% | -3.82% | -81.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.44% | 0.89% | +66.55% |
Volatility
EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
EOS (EOS-USD) has a higher volatility of 30.32% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 4.78%. This indicates that EOS-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EOS-USD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.32% | 4.78% | +25.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.92% | 8.50% | +49.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.08% | 9.70% | +54.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.88% | 14.84% | +57.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 109.13% | 15.56% | +93.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EOS-USD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EOS-USD has higher volatility (30.32%) compared to QYLD (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOS-USD dropped -99.71% vs QYLD's -24.75%.
QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EOS-USD and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer