PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EOS-USD vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EOS (EOS-USD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EOS-USD achieves a -53.71% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 9.09% return.


EOS-USD

1D
2.61%
1M
1.57%
6M
-59.45%
YTD
-53.71%
1Y
-86.54%
3Y*
-54.35%
5Y*
-54.58%
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-1.68%
1M
1.35%
6M
7.69%
YTD
9.09%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EOS-USD
EOS
-53.71%-79.52%-8.35%-1.89%-71.60%16.76%0.93%0.16%-70.72%2,091.49%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
9.09%9.28%19.35%22.77%-19.08%10.41%8.72%22.69%-3.07%7.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EOS-USD and QYLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2017

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EOS-USD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EOS-USD
EOS-USD Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
EOS-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EOS-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
EOS-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EOS-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EOS-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EOS (EOS-USD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EOS-USDQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.44

-0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.97

4.45

-5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.26

23.14

-24.40

EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EOS-USD Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EOS-USD and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EOS-USD drawdown since its inception was -99.72%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EOS-USD and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EOS-USDQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.72%

-24.75%

-74.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-90.38%

-4.97%

-85.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.62%

-19.06%

-76.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.05%

-24.61%

-74.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.66%

-1.68%

-97.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-85.03%

-3.81%

-81.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

62.83%

0.95%

+61.88%

Volatility

EOS-USD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

EOS (EOS-USD) has a higher volatility of 18.75% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 5.77%. This indicates that EOS-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EOS-USDQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.75%

5.77%

+12.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.79%

9.39%

+48.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.68%

10.57%

+54.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

71.41%

14.96%

+56.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

108.90%

15.59%

+93.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


EOS-USD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EOS-USD has higher volatility (18.75%) compared to QYLD (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EOS-USD dropped -99.72% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EOS-USD and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer